Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Lots:

  • Siri
  • New File System
  • Read/Write NTFS
  • OpenGL 4.4
  • OpenCL 2
  • iCloud documents -> like dropbox
  • Finder improvements -> like XtraFinder
  • More video/audio codecs supported by iTunes -> so I'm not forced to use something like vlc or mplayerx for non iTunes Store videos
  • Allow iTunes to store media across multiple drives -> for example music on the internal and movies/video/apps on an external drive
  • Let the computer connect to iOS devices over wifi and browse pictures/other allowed content in Finder like a mounted drive
  • Launchpad improvements -> better moving of icons, multi icon select, right click context menu, folders in folders
  • Improved functionality of Airport Utility
  • More options for multi monitor settings
  • Further notification center improvements -> 'today, all, missed' like on iOS 7 maybe?
  • More notifications for apps the are not running
  • Icon/UI re-design
  • If it doesn't happen by 10.9 release -> redesign Game center, reminders and several other apps to match the new plain/flat iOS/OSX style
  • More new apps
    • Maybe a torrent client could come standard with the OS like Transmission
    • Clock App - lets you set alarms, timers, stop watch, wake computer at certain times and run task (already exists but could be integrated into this app), etc
    • A quality maintinance utility like Onyx
  • Trim support non standard SSDs without the help of Trim enabler
  • Better screen brightness controls -> like f.lux
  • Support for unpacking .rar and several other formats aside from .zip
  • Safari improvements
    • Better HTML5 Support (pretty sure iOS 7 Safari has better support then OSX Safari)
    • Simultaneous Private browsing with non-Private windows
    • Fix some bugs like always reloading when going back on certain sites
    • Retain zoom in between sessions
    • Allow aspects of the new sidebar to be hidden/resized like Shared Link for example
    • Give an option to move tabs into the top bar like Chrome
    • More advanced syncing (preferences, extensions, etc)
  • Fix the slow shutdown :|

I'm sure there's plenty more too.

Some of the things you listed are pretty good but some of them are useless / never going to happen.
Let me ask you a question : are you new to OS X ?

OS X does not need OnyX app-like or any other maintenance app.
It knows how to mange you system. This is one of the best underrated features of Mac OS X. The only thing that OS X really needs is to sometimes repair disk permission, which you can do with the build in Disk Utillity app.

Torrent client by default ? Never.

Slow shotdown ? It's fixed with Mavericks.
 
Window snapping and key commands to switch monitors and rearrange windows. You know, like windows and Linux (depending on DE) have had for years. I'm okay with using bettersnaptool but I just don't understand why this hasn't been implemented.
 
Last edited:
You think UI inconsistencies are good? There's parts of the UI floating around from 10.4 or 10.5. Some things didn't get changed from 10.6. Now there'a a lot of iOS 6 things (Notes icon, reminders, GC) with a mix of iOS 7 things (Calendar, Maps, iBooks). Please tell me why this is a good thing?

They arent exactly good. But then again, they arent bad either, as none of them impact the usage of the operating system.

On the whole, I do think the UI should be made consistent. I wouldnt argue with it. But OS X's UI is distinct from iOS7, while taking cues from it in select places, where it makes sense.

Places like the login screen, or the notification center or dashboard were flattened, and whatever skueomorphism they had was removed.

Calendar lost its leather, and the main views were sharpened up some, and made to fit better with Aqua UI paradigm that has existed since Leopard/Snow Leopard.

The only thing about Maps (or iBooks) thats even remotely close to iOS7 are their icons. And I would even say that Maps is further from iOS7 than iBooks is. But they both still use Aqua as their UI chrome. And I dont see any hints in their UI that would point toward an iOS7 styled UI coming in the pipe.

As for the stuff that didnt change since Mountain Lion; yes, Game Center's UI should change. Drop the wood grain and felt, and bring Aqua to the UI.

Notes? The UI changed, and its icon conveys the purpose of the app. I dont see any reason why it should change, nor what its icon could change to.

Reminders? Yea, some of the skeuomorphism could be dropped, but next to Maverick's Notes UI, its remarkably similar already. Bring the Aqua UI chrome to it and drop the lined paper loog and they'd be almost the same.

So making the UI consistent is good. But that doesnt need to involve changing the whole UI or even most of the UI. Aqua is a fully fleshed out UI, apps need to be brought in line with it, yes. But it does not need to be pitched for a completely new UI.

iOS7's UI maybe ok on a small phone screen, and it may even be ok on a 9.7inch iPad screen (and between the two, I think it actually looks better on the iPad's screen). But it will not look good on screens larger than that. And certainly not on non-Apple displays.

Apple has made fun of Microsoft for bringing their mobile UI to desktop/laptop PCs. I very much doubt they would go on and do the same thing.


You're going to be quite upset come WWDC 2014.

If it pans out that Apple wants to bring Fisher Price UI to OS X, then yes, I will be. It'll also be the last OS upgrade I make (short of purchasing a new Mac) just as iOS6 was the last iOS update I made.
 
Things to do:

- General speed improvements, including boot time and shut down.
- Siri
- Colour in the finder, come on!
- Translucency for things like NC.
- Improvement of maps and books, both need to a lot more robust.


Things NOT to do:

- iOS 7 style icons
 
Diminishing revenues from desktops and laptops, faster more powerful A chips, SSD storage - lead to iOSX for the masses. They are not expanding their campus and building a new one to work on expanded OSX projects. Refinement of handheld devices and being a force in the Chinese market are target goals.
 
I think it would be pretty cool if the mac and idevice software was one and the same, for the next generation, and just called "OS". A lot cleaner than OS 11 and iOS8...
 
Projects feature on OS X:

Window with files from different applications pertaining to certain project:
-Files with certain tags are automatically linked to a project
-Separate clipboards for different projects that show what is available for pasting (temporary file space)
-Undo History for multiple programs and files
-Projects backed up to Time Machine (restore individual files or the whole project to a certain time)
-Versions of project (revert individual files or whole project)
-Project notes
-Project calendar/to-do
-iWork collaboration feature integrated into Projects
-Projects synced in iCloud

The Projects feature would be a gateway to document management on iOS as a simpler alternative to a filesystem.
 
I think it would be pretty cool if the mac and idevice software was one and the same, for the next generation, and just called "OS". A lot cleaner than OS 11 and iOS8...

How is that even going to work? iOS is, by design, a lightweight operating system specifically architected for a touch device. It would need tremendous effort to create one piece of software, not to mention the waste of resources. Giving them the same name is a different thing, but I do not really see the necessity. As long as they are separate products, there should be some distinction to prevent confusion. iOS 8 and OS 11 might not look 'clean' but they are clear.

On the whole, I do think the UI should be made consistent. I wouldnt argue with it. But OS X's UI is distinct from iOS7, while taking cues from it in select places, where it makes sense.

I fully agree with your statement. I also think that Apple will have a tough time bringing the iOS 7 UI to the Mac anyway. This whole idea of a layered OS and motion is specifically designed for an edge-to-edge screen on a touch device. How is that supposed to work for an operating system that is primarily based on windows? It's not. We have seen that with Microsoft's Windows Vista too, you will need to have some sort of canvas.

The screenshot posted earlier by Sky Blue is a very good example of that. While the window may look iOS 7'ish, it does not add anything. What is the point of translucency when the window itself is a white canvas? The entire OS will look very bland and boring, I doubt it adds much, if anything, to the user experience. When OS X should have a new look, just for sake of it, then something is seriously wrong at Apple. I don't even want to think about the compatibility issues that may arise because of this. I have so many apps on my Mac that only receive few updates or have not been updated for a while, or perhaps are not going to be (but they still work). How are those apps going to cope with a completely new design? I am not sure whether this is the path Apple should be taking. iOS has certain key advantages where a redesign is much more feasible, although also there these compatibility issues are present.

On a side note, the new iWork apps already seem to experiment with a flat UI. A lot of the Aqua UI has been removed. I am not sure whether it has improved anything. It looks like a web app baked into a window.
 
You mean windows snapping, right?

Lol yes that's what I meant. I just edited the post. Although window "slapping" is an interesting idea too. Maybe it could be one of those pointless functions that you only use to play around with, sort of like holding shift while doing anything that triggers an animation.
 
Why does everyone want Siri?

Imagine the potential...

You could move files on your Mac without ever touching the mouse/trackpad. User: "Move all mp3 files from Downloads into Music."

Siri: "Ok, all mp3 files were moved from Downloads to Music. Anything else you want me to do?"

User: "Empty the trash, connect to the closest network, and open Safari."

Siri: "OK, I did those 3 actions. Would you like to create a script for next time?"

User: "Yes. Call it 'test script' and run it at login."

Siri: "OK, I created your script. In addition to running at login, you can call it anytime by saying: 'run test script'."

It would take a lot of programming, but it is an important step to the computer of the future.
 
The future of OS X should be:

- Visual makeover similar to iOS 7 because I have to say Windows 8 looks better than the majority of OS X visually
- Siri (I was seriously hoping for this in Mavericks)
- OS XI name :p
 
If all that is left for Apple to do other than copy 3rd party ideas I'd say their innovation has truly peaked. If that's the case... I'd rather they look back into previous versions of OSX and resurrect some of their own ideas that people miss and provide options to activate or ignore them. (e.g., Spaces & the old Expose'). And I still struggle with "Versions".

But this will never happen of course.

Agree but OSX is a General Consumer OS. 3rd parties will continue to lead the way on this.

I see some good ideas in this thread, but most of it is just nit picking small stuff for the immediate future. OS X has lots of stuff it can improve upon, but to really see all that it can be, you have to have a much broader vision of what computing should be like for us in the future; and how OSes in general will take us there.

Remember, SJ wanted to sell us things we didn't know we wanted, but once we see it would trigger a, "Duh, why wasn't it always like this?" moment.

So, what should computers/computing be like 5 years, or 10 years from now? That's where OS X, and hopefully others are headed.

Personally, I'm really hoping all these advancements in processing power will actually result in more "me" time. There's really no need to chase or drool over the latest specs if paying all that money just results in more headaches and less time to enjoy your life. Improved experience is what Apple wants to focus on, but many of us are still chasing the latest specs hoping the newest shiny things will somehow drastically improve our lives even though the last generation items were just as good one day prior. This is speaking just on the CPU processors... of course, things like Touch ID and a combination of other things does sometime improve the efficiency of security/lives on a day-to-day basis.

So, what can we expect? Well, for one, you can probably tell that the iPad, MBP, etc. are moving more towards non-serviceable, not easily upgradeable parts. Once the full migration with iCloud is complete, I'm expecting people will be able to walk into the Apple store, and have their laptops exchanged (instead of serviced) as easily as iPhones. Why are we headed this way? Cause having zero down time does improve your life vs. waiting 3 days to get your primary machine fixed. Plus, the laptops are just tools and tools should be replaceable.

However, before we get there, there's still a lot of work to be done. More apps need to make use of the iCloud; ideally to the point of you logging into your iCloud/iTunes account on a new machine and all of your apps, settings, backgrounds, data, media, etc. are downloaded (close to instantly) so you'd have your new workstation up and running in an hour or less.

Another thing to improve upon is maybe the hiding of the file system. Yes, this goes against what most of us wants; even myself, but the truth is, that's how computing should be. The only people that really need access to files are content producers - whether that'd be business presentations, science, music, movies, web/program developers, etc. Most media/general consumers are playing Angry Birds, spending money on Farmville or whatever to get to the next level. What none of them ever talks about is how they should manage their saved games for these apps - and I believe that's what Apple is hoping to achieve with iTunes and iPhoto. Granted, it'll be awhile before most of us will be able to relinquish that control... but in the end, if we ever get there, life will be easier/better for us.

Sync'ing, collaboration, continuing media/work streams from one device to another will be the future of computing. What I'd love to see personally is seeing those abilities expand beyond just Netflix, documents collaboration, etc. For example, sometimes I run cron jobs in Terminal for my business - I do it manually instead of activating a cron job so I can see the results in real time. I do this on my MBP cause it's my primary machine, however, if I need to leave for a meeting, it'd be great if I can swipe that Terminal window to a local mini or Mac Pro so it can continue to run while I pack up the MBP to take with me. Imagine being able to retain your session on any app, whether it's a Terminal window, or a Skype chat from a desktop to your iPad. Those are the innovations I'd like to see as we move forward with computing.

Of course, battery improvements from using less energy is also important - but they're already doing a great job at tackling that part aggressively compared to MS.
 
I wouldn't be too sad if the next OS X version was just like this one. They make performance better, they make battery life better, they do a lot of bug fixes. Then they throw in really updated default apps and call it a day. It's not like people can complain about "spending money for bug fixes" anymore. It's free.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.