Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Do people really need that much? I remember people saying nobody needed 1.5TB of the Mac Pro 7,1 (with a theoretical 2.0TB maximum).

Or maybe it was just cover for the M2 Mac Pro having 192GB limit.
I have 256GB in one server and 128GB in the other (linux boxes, not Macs). That's enough for the dev work we currently have, but I can expand both to 2TB if I needed to. Professional users do sometimes need large amounts of memory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: avro707
i Really really want to update my Mac Studio (M1 Max/64GB/2 TB), but I just can't "justify" spending CAD4K+ on a new Mac that I am not sure will significantly speed up my experience and workflow.

I do the normal office related stuff on my Studio, and as for more demanding workflows I am a photographer, have a ton of editing apps, and import hundreds of 100MB RAW files into Lightroom on a regular basis. Editing is usually in the Adobe Creative Suite and PhotoMatix Pro. I do a bit of video editing, again, using Adobe Creative Suite, Final Cut Pro, Compressor, and Motion, but not much. Nothing too demading...

Would I even benefit from a new Mac Studio - M5 Max, 64/128GB, 2TB?

My advice would be to wait for reviews discussing photography/video-related workflows on the M5 max and decide for yourself if the gains were worth your money. For the non-demanding work your current M1 max is more than enough and an M5 max would not bring much of an upgrade there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Killerbob
That’s not even its final form! They’re working on a design more like this to succeed both the Mac Studio and the Mac Pro:

View attachment 2604470
I'm probably in the minority but I genuinely though that was GORGEOUS and always loved it. A shame it... sucked. Lacked real expandability, throttled like crazy.

Once every couple of months I browse eBay. They're cheap now. And I kinda want one. Truth is I have no real use for it. Could stick it in the homelab but then it would just be taking over services in a way that's less efficient than what they're running on now. But I mean; still! It's cool!
 
i Really really want to update my Mac Studio (M1 Max/64GB/2 TB), but I just can't "justify" spending CAD4K+ on a new Mac that I am not sure will significantly speed up my experience and workflow.

I do the normal office related stuff on my Studio, and as for more demanding workflows I am a photographer, have a ton of editing apps, and import hundreds of 100MB RAW files into Lightroom on a regular basis. Editing is usually in the Adobe Creative Suite and PhotoMatix Pro. I do a bit of video editing, again, using Adobe Creative Suite, Final Cut Pro, Compressor, and Motion, but not much. Nothing too demading...

WOuld I even benefit from a new Mac Studio - M5 Max, 64/128GB, 2TB?
I don't know, but I'll bet Apple will target you this time. It's always interesting the see what comparisons are featured in the press releases. For the M4 Max Mac Studio, the comparisons were to the iMac with Core i9. The M3 Ultra model was compared to both M1 Ultra and Xeon W. I think the M5 Max will be compared to the M1 Max first and maybe also the iMac Pro.
 
Holding out for the rumored Mac Studio Pro


View attachment 2604319
Make it slightly taller so that all the sides are even. Then place it in a clear acrylic outer case to give the illusion that it's floating.
ae46b1f460ee46f789c27b264a6cb421-4-720x540.png
 
I'm probably in the minority but I genuinely thought that was GORGEOUS and always loved it. A shame it... sucked. Lacked real expandability, throttled like crazy.

Once every couple of months I browse eBay. They're cheap now. And I kinda want one. Truth is I have no real use for it. Could stick it in the homelab but then it would just be taking over services in a way that's less efficient than what they're running on now. But I mean; still! It's cool!

I still have one of those - it’s in pristine condition too and absolutely maximum spec. Beautiful but like any black coloured device it shows dust like crazy and is surprisingly noisy when the fans crank up. The 7,1 tower for me is even better, such a great piece of design the way the air vents are sculpted.

Mine got a lot of use when my original (also maximum spec) 5,1 failed. Then I swapped over to the 7,1 and that was so good I got a second one. I still run them. They are so good that I could skip the following generations of “pro” Macs. The cooling especially was massively overkill but resulted in an always quiet machine, even in warm conditions.
 
Last edited:
Waiting for the M5 Max Mac Studio over the Mini because of the extra GPU power. Call me crazy but I do all my gaming on my Mac! Got more than enough games to play with macOS-native games, some iPad games running on macOS, and Windows games via CrossOver (besides the PS5).
I’ve been wondering if I can get away with Macintosh gaming with crossover…

The Studio is physically an appealing design in terms of looks, cooling, and weight, and I’m leaning heavily towards really wanting to try switching to Macintosh again.

Only thing is some of the benefit for me would be from “hey siri”, which a mini or studio doesn’t have without a Studio Display, and there’s no way I’m getting one when it doesn’t have hdr at a minimum for games and video, and I reeeeally want a second video input too 😕

Ideally with hdmi directly and ideally more than one. I assume the speakers are good and better/louder than my current monitor.
 
I still have one of those - it’s in pristine condition too and absolutely maximum spec. Beautiful but like any black coloured device it shows dust like crazy and is surprisingly noisy when the fans crank up. The 7,1 tower for me is even better, such a great piece of design the way the air vents are sculpted.

Mine got a lot of use when my original (also maximum spec) 5,1 failed. Then I swapped over to the 7,1 and that was so good I got a second one. I still run them. They are so good that I could skip the following generations of “pro” Macs. The cooling especially was massively overkill but resulted in an always quiet machine, even in warm conditions.
There were two revisions of the cube? I probably should have gotten one instead of the pro I got.
 
What ‘update’ does the Mac Studio need to be renamed as Mac Pro so they can just discontinue the 🧀 Mac Pro?
Well, without removing what it currently has. Adding a couple M.2 ports internally so that you can expand storage without changing out Apple's proprietary main storage. I'd be totally cool with 1TB main drive if I can add a 4TB to it in the future, or even right away. Also, Make it easier to disassemble to clean dust out as well. I'd love upgradable RAM, but that's much harder to do with the way they have built Apple Silicon so I guess I'll let that be, but it would be cool if you could add sticks of RAM that just got used once the unified memory was full. Then you could increase it, but the remaining RAM would just be slower, but still faster than an SSD.
 
The other option is to severely over engineer causing a $3,000 premium for the same performance? Causing it to be even more of a niche product that they can just drop because of sales. A basic box is better than how they are treating it right now.
I think we would have been better off if they just went back to the old cheese grater design and updated the internals. Would have been cheaper, and still looked good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wolfpup
That is Nvidia NOT Apple, we are discussing Apple, also they are not using Apples SOC's either. I do not see the link at all here? At current it is a face you CANNOT upgrade the memory in the Mac Pro with Apple Silicon, that is not wrong at all and neither was my first comment.
data-center-grace-og.jpg

Again, Nvidia made their own workstations with proprietary systems. They already have a CPU + GPU socket which also has LPDRR5 memories along with regular memories a while ago.

With Mac Pro, they simply need to add RAM slots.
 
I respectfully disagree. My apple desktops so far have been all beautifully designed thermally* delivering quiet predictable performance, whereas my dell notebook was the loudest piece of equipment in my home, and my dell tower was also well audible while also ginormous. I do appreciate the effort apple put in their thermal designs* and would continue paying a premium for that.

* sans the m4 mini which throttles notably in the pro variant.
For the M4 Pro If you put the Energy into "High Performance" mode, it ramps the fans up, so it doesn't throttle - of course the fans run fast enough to be heard. Or use a 3rd party app to set a minimum speed high enough for your particular task, and keep them quieter.

I saw more throttling on the base M4 models with certain tasks - the fan profile prioritizes low fan speeds over keeping up with cooling - used some 3rd party software to set a higher minimum fan speed to compensate so it wouldn't throttle. (like Macs Fan Control, but there are at least 3+ different apps that can, some as a pay-for only)
 
I’ve been wondering if I can get away with Macintosh gaming with crossover…

The Studio is physically an appealing design in terms of looks, cooling, and weight, and I’m leaning heavily towards really wanting to try switching to Macintosh again.

Only thing is some of the benefit for me would be from “hey siri”, which a mini or studio doesn’t have without a Studio Display, and there’s no way I’m getting one when it doesn’t have hdr at a minimum for games and video, and I reeeeally want a second video input too 😕

Ideally with hdmi directly and ideally more than one. I assume the speakers are good and better/louder than my current monitor.

For "hey siri" you just need to have a microphone, a cheap webcam will have one, you don't need a studio display for that! And a second display is easy via usb-c/thunderbolt since you can get a usb-c to HDMI dongle for cheap. The studio M4 Max can have up to 5 displays!

About gaming with CrossOver, the key is what games do you like to play? Some online competitive games like Valorant have very aggressive anticheat systems that don't work on anything other than an Intel/AMD CPU Windows PC. Other than that, compatibility is not 100% perfect but these days it's pretty darn good!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wolfpup
Mac Pro will remain irrelevant unless it features something more powerful than Ultra.
I'm all for more than the Ultra but until then, I would settle for the Mac Pro with Ultra chip. Better then the M2 by far.

For PCI-E expansion for high bandwidth ssd storage etc. the Mac Pro is the only option at full PCI speeds. And with M5 it should at least be PCI-E v5, hopefully, with more lanes added on.
 
View attachment 2604608
Again, Nvidia made their own workstations with proprietary systems. They already have a CPU + GPU socket which also has LPDRR5 memories along with regular memories a while ago.

With Mac Pro, they simply need to add RAM slots.

No disrespect, but just how do YOU know all Apple has to do is ‘add RAM slots’, considering they use Unified memory. It seems a bit strange to look at one ’proprietary’ system and ‘assume’ that means another totally different ‘proprietary’ system is the same.
 
Something really great about the older 2010-2012-era Mac Pros was that the case was really thick and provided great shielding for use in a recording studio,
 
No disrespect, but just how do YOU know all Apple has to do is ‘add RAM slots’, considering they use Unified memory. It seems a bit strange to look at one ’proprietary’ system and ‘assume’ that means another totally different ‘proprietary’ system is the same.
In addition, Nvidia DGX systems don’t have upgradeable memory, nor do the GB200 and B200 shown in the image they posted. Nothing in that image (from here) uses “RAM slots,” nor does the DGX Spark or DGX Station.
 
For "hey siri" you just need to have a microphone, a cheap webcam will have one, you don't need a studio display for that! And a second display is easy via usb-c/thunderbolt since you can get a usb-c to HDMI dongle for cheap. The studio M4 Max can have up to 5 displays!

About gaming with CrossOver, the key is what games do you like to play? Some online competitive games like Valorant have very aggressive anticheat systems that don't work on anything other than an Intel/AMD CPU Windows PC. Other than that, compatibility is not 100% perfect but these days it's pretty darn good!
I looked in to just using an external microphone, but everything I found said you can only trigger hey siri with a built in microphone (or apple Studio Display, or line iPods, which I’m never wearing at home)?

I would love for that to be wrong! My work around was planning on getting a MacBook, sticking it behind my monitor, and probably the microphones would pick me up fine, but if an external mic worked that would open up the Mac mini and studio, and with m5’s that gets appealing! Even the ultra which ought to have serious grunt for games (the m3 ultra was less tempting for me, but the starting price isn’t too outlandish compared to high end windows pc or MacBook Pro, but probably quieter, cools better, and smaller than a MacBook, and of course higher end!)

I don’t care about online stuff much at all, so I may be a good candidate! (I’m not competitive, I like stories and single player stuff)

I wish Macintosh steam included proton like the Linux steam, but I guess codeweavers does similar, and hopefully isn’t a security vulnerability. I’m increasingly worried about security over the years! That’s one of the reasons I’m considering switching again for my main pc, because Apple doesn’t have your keys for tons of your data!
 
No disrespect, but just how do YOU know all Apple has to do is ‘add RAM slots’, considering they use Unified memory. It seems a bit strange to look at one ’proprietary’ system and ‘assume’ that means another totally different ‘proprietary’ system is the same.
Nvidia already used unified memory for Grace ARM CPU. Besides, Nvidia developed unified memory WAY before Apple did. Also, Mac's SSD is a great example of having a proprietary system with upgradability so why do you keep ignoring the fact?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Non-Euclidean
I don’t care about online stuff much at all, so I may be a good candidate! (I’m not competitive, I like stories and single player stuff)

There's a free one month trial for Crossover, so you can see how well your Steam library runs. I use it to game on my MBA, and it does a pretty good job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wolfpup
There's a free one month trial for Crossover, so you can see how well your Steam library runs. I use it to game on my MBA, and it does a pretty good job.
How the heck well does the air cope with the cpu/GPU being pushed to 100% for hours (games) or days (handbrake)? Does it fry the thing?

I sometimes think of the air too as I love the idea of no fan.

And thanks for the info! I’ll definitely try it and I think there’s a lifetime update thingee maybe that I might get.
 
View attachment 2604608
Again, Nvidia made their own workstations with proprietary systems. They already have a CPU + GPU socket which also has LPDRR5 memories along with regular memories a while ago.

With Mac Pro, they simply need to add RAM slots.
All the RAM on those boards is either soldered -- LPDDR5X for the CPU, or on-substrate -- HBM3 for the GPU (MCM module). I've never seen a Grace/Hopper setup with RAM slots (for the CPU, as clearly HBM3 is out of the question), and I doubt such exist. NV offer 3 configurable-at-purchase RAM setups for Grace boards, just like Apple do with AS SKUs.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.