Catonow said:
Sorry, but this isn't nearly as astute as some here seem to think. It can be said about virtually every debate. More than that, it's completely unhelpful.
Yeah, that's true. I would rephrase the same point something like this:
It's not so much a question of one platform being
better than the other. Each has its strong points and its loyal users. Still, they differ in important (and not always obvious) ways. They seem to appeal to different types of people, just like early "microcomputers" attracted different sets of users 30 years ago, even though from a technical standpoint it was hard to argue that, say, the Apple II was "better" than a machine running CP/M.
Case in point: Apple products, for one reason or another, have always appealed especially to artists, writers, designers, musicians and the like. I presume such people respond to the company's obsessive commitment to beautiful design. But even this point is arguable. I remember when most of the writers I knew were buying Macs, but the
science fiction writers were not only buying MS-DOS machines, they were willing to fight you over it. I formed the habit back then of keeping my mouth shut as a matter of self-preservation. Nobody wanted Jerry Pournelle ramming a broomstick up their, you know.
It continues into the present. Some people love, and I mean
love, almost everything Jonny Ive sets his hand to. And it's not because we're "sheeple" who have succumbed to Apple hype. Other people enjoy the excitement and the open possibilities that Android offers. I respect that. But these are not just matters of taste; they are very real responses to different products by people with different personality types. In some murky but undeniable way, there are iOS people and there are Android people, and the two sets are not equal or interchangeable. You probably know who you are, if you've found your way to this forum.
Case in point 2, or Why I Love My iPhone More Than Beer Itself: the whole "iPhoneography" scene. This is one of those things that happen when artistic/creative types flock en masse to the same place at the same time. There is no inherent reason there couldn't be an equally lively and burgeoning equivalent to this phenomenon on the Android side, with high-profile exhbitions of Android-created photographs in major cities across the world. But there just isn't. And there never is going to be. It has nothing to do with one platform being "better." It's because artists buy Apple, and developers who understand artists develop first and foremost for iOS, and that's just they way it is.
Probably there's some corollary. Like maybe developers who understand, say, hackers and do-it-yourself types develop primarily for Android. (And don't make much money, because hackers and DIYers don't like to pay for things if they can figure out sone clever way around it, which usually they can.)
I can't do much for myself except write books and take pictures and garden, with an occasional foray into the culinary arts, and even then I'd happily pay someone to wash the dishes. I am a total mark for iOS. I've spent roughly one gazillion dollars at the App Store ($1.99 at a time) and I thoroughly enjoy it. But I don't expect the world to be full of people like me. That would be kind of boring.