Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Cod3rror

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Apr 18, 2010
1,834
192
Apple mentioned that iPhone 5s had a "desktop class CPU". Do you think iPhone and iPad will eventually replace the Macbooks?

Eventually, in a few years iPhone will be as powerful as current Macbooks and Apple will have to take it somewhere.
 
Apple mentioned that iPhone 5s had a "desktop class CPU". Do you think iPhone and iPad will eventually replace the Macbooks?

Eventually, in a few years iPhone will be as powerful as current Macbooks and Apple will have to take it somewhere.

and wont those macbooks become more powerful as well?
 
and wont those macbooks become more powerful as well?

They will, but for general consumers it won't matter that much because after a certain point the power is just "good enough". iPhone on the other hand will be at a point of being able to run a full desktop OS.
 
By saying "desktop class cpu" it sounds to me like a marketing ploy. Everything at this stage is all relative. It could mean its the lowest end desktop cpu performance and Apple still classifys it as desktop cpu class.
 
It is a marketing ploy. No way can an iPhone do what Macs can do, not even 5 years from now.

Desktop-class architecture is referring to the 64-bit chip, but no way is it saying its as powerful as the Macs.

The future of the iPhone is that it will become more and more like a computer, but no way is it replacing them.
 
The iPhone and iPad will never replace MacBooks. I don't see either device handling Lightroom and Photoshop software that I use on a daily basis to process my huge DSLR files.
 
In reality who cares. Just live the moment and stop thinking about the future. Remember, there is nobody at Palo Alto headquarters thinking about you.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.