I highly doubt that a 15" pro will live along side a 16" pro. Makes zero sense. On the other hand I would welcome a 15" Air.
There already is something in between - The $1799 'full fat' 13", with 2.4GHz+ processor and 4 TB3 ports... and by the time you upgrade to a quad i7, 512GB SSD and 16GB RAM you're paying $2499, more than the 6-core 15".
The $1299 "entry" model is the 'lite' version (what used to be the 'non-touchbar' until this summer) with the 1.4 GHz processor and only 2 TB3 ports.
I can see that some people would want a 15" or 16" with a cheaper CPU and no dGPU, if they just needed a bigger screen for 2D/office work, web development etc. where the new 16" would be an overkill. I wouldn't hold my breath though - that's been true since about 2012. And if it did come out, it would probably be cheaper for Apple to use the 16" screen rather than tool up for yet another case design.
If you look at the first reviews nobody is raving about the life-changing extra 0.4" of screen - its not something people are going to pay a premium for. Its almost as if the bigger screen is only there to fill up the extra area needed to implement the new keyboard, speakers, battery and cooling system, without making the bezels bigger...
The idea that the 15" would continue was from an alternate universe in which the 16" was a new super-pro $4000 super-laptop. Even if it happens it still won't make sense
As for 13"/14", that's anybody's guess. I'm sure the keyboard will get replaced at some stage, at least on the 13" MBP - they can hardly keep selling the old one with a straight face. Not sure the cooling/battery was ever such a biggie on the 13". If they have to make it bigger, then maybe they'll give it a 13.7" screen to fill the blank...
The other (pure speculation) is that the entry-level 13" would make more sense as a "MacBook" now the 12" is dead, giving us 13" MacBook Air, 13" MacBook, 14" MacBook Pro, 16" MacBook Pro....
Who pays for a $499 for iPad Air when the $329 iPad exists?
People who want the significantly better specs of the iPad Air, that go beyond the screen size?
The $329 iPad is a built-down-to-a-price "economy" version using old technology, particularly aimed at schools buying hundreds of the things - and something of a panic reaction to the popularity of Chromebooks in school. If Apple did decide to produce a cheap MacBook for schools they wouldn't start with the 15" MBP.
That's exactly what he's predicting - the return of 15" with scissor.
Right now, the gap between 13" and 16" is more than $1,000.
The 16” didnt even get most of these things.....14” display even if larger size, 2k display, 1080p camera, Face ID, HDMI port, tapered lower like the MBA, better speakers, 512 SSD minimum and more color options like white, black and midnight green.
And you think that’s going to happen?
It’s messy enough with the Air, and 13” MBP so close. Why would they discontinue the 15” only to reintroduce another one. The majority of people don’t select laptops by keyboard type, but rather size.
The gap prior to Wednesday’s announcement was also $1000, so nothing has changed. I think they’d go up in size with the 13” to 14” if they want to close that gap.
Kuo thinks 15" will return with scissor. This is a copy of the successful 5.8", 6.1", 6.5" strategy. Right now, we have MacBooks that are either small or big. That simple strategy may have worked when Apple could rely on iPhone as the bread winner.
15" is analogous to the 6.1" iPhone. There's a number of customers that want a large display but don't need a $2,399 notebook with discrete video and six speakers.
15" is analogous to the 6.1" iPhone. There's a number of customers that want a large display but don't need a $2,399 notebook with discrete video and six speakers.
Mac shipments have been stagnant or declining the past several quarters, while Lenovo, HP and Dell have seen growth. We saw Apple shift its strategy with the iPhone XR and iPad Air. Is it that difficult to believe Apple wants to close that $1,100 gap between 13- and 16-inch?
Is it that difficult to believe Apple will close that $1100 gap with a higher-priced 14-inch model?
The industry has standardized around 13", 15", and 17" with good reason.
14" isn't portable enough and isn't a desktop replacement either.
I'm not sure how a 15" would come back when the 16" is basically the 15"
Regardless, a 14" display in the same 13" form factor is portable enough.
Kuo already told us the 13.3" will stay for 2020.
13.3"
15.6"
16"
I'm not sure why people keep dreaming of a 14". Do they know more than Kuo?
View attachment 877006
The key factor in all of this is whether Apple thinks the 13" Pro can be made into a much better product by making it a little bigger. The 16" Pro is clearly a superior product to the old 15" because it allowed for better thermals, beefier GPUs, and a larger battery. The 13" uses lower wattage components, so they might not feel that there is much benefit to be realised from give them more breathing space. It really depends on whether that extra volume would allow them to enhance performance (eg. DDR4 RAM, a low TDP dGPU, etc), otherwise they'd probably view it as not worth the effort and expense.
An interesting point on differentiating the two lines - apparently at the private press briefing in New York, Apple showed a slide about their "Pro notebook" lineup where the 13" MBP wasn't included. The 16" is also now listed separately on apple.com/mac rather than just being subsumed into the MBP page.On one hand I can see how Apple may want to greater differentiate the two lines, by not updating the 13 into a 14”. Yes, size will allow them to improve on thermals and implement potentially faster chips.
But the elephant in the room is the keyboard. I know, it may just be a vocal minority who have had issues with the butterfly keys. But even newbies to Mac researching a purchase, will be turned off by the negative feedback about these keys. I’m guessing the majority of MBP’s sold is skewed towards the smaller 13”. So there’s a huge base of potential buyers.
Apple won’t outright admit to being wrong. But I can’t see them not changing the 13” MBP over to scissor keys. And in doing so, the extra space needed, may just point them to changing the overall size of the case as well.
You're missing an important piece of context about these predictions. At the time he put this out, the rumour mill suggested that the 16" model would be significantly different looking (if you remember those renders with even bezels and rounded display corners), and would co-exist with the 15" and be positioned above at a higher price point. It was only just before the launch that we learned it was merely a refined design, and would be replacing the 15" at the same start price. I think if you asked Kuo today, he'd probably drop the 15" from his table. Your point about him having not reported the existence of any 14" display is fair, but your defence of the 15" in 2020 is odd because that prediction was made when we had a different understanding of the 16".
[automerge]1573892165[/automerge]
I think just because we haven't heard anything about a 14" Pro yet doesn't mean it's not possible, it just means that if it did happen, it would probably be June (WWDC?) at the earliest. If they were to do a 14" panel, they wouldn't need to be doing trial production more than a few months in advance, because they would just take the same panel design as the 16" and lop a few pixels off (eg. 14" at 226ppi = 2688x1680).
The key factor in all of this is whether Apple thinks the 13" Pro can be made into a much better product by making it a little bigger. The 16" Pro is clearly a superior product to the old 15" because it allowed for better thermals, beefier GPUs, and a larger battery. The 13" uses lower wattage components, so they might not feel that there is much benefit to be realised from give them more breathing space. It really depends on whether that extra volume would allow them to enhance performance (eg. DDR4 RAM, a low TDP dGPU, etc), otherwise they'd probably view it as not worth the effort and expense.