Apologies if this has been asked already but is there any significance to the time '10:09' that all AW faces revert to in settings? Is it just an arbitrary time or does it mean something to someone somewhere? Just curious.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What's the significance of 10:09?
- Thread starter richCB
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
std settings for all watches are 10:10 http://mentalfloss.com/article/22461/why-1010-default-setting-clocks-and-watches
i think apple just wanted to be one min ahead of the competitors...
i think apple just wanted to be one min ahead of the competitors...
Not necessarily. It might be that they didn't want the minute hand to block the 2 (at :10) on analog faces in the marketing pics so they moved it out of the way, and they wanted to be consistent with it in the digital format.
Last edited:
No... he's pretty much correct.
http://www.businessinsider.com/why-apple-watches-all-display-1009-in-advertisments-2015-3
The article is still speculative. Notice that the article offered an alternative explanation from The Loop's Dave Mark.
That's why I wrote "Not necessarily," as I'm recognizing that my theory is also speculative with regards to visual effects. If it were 10:10, the minute hand would be blocking the 2 in marketing pics. They're also doing the same thing with the second hand right between 1 and 2 in 12, and ditto for the complications.
Last edited:
I get that... and I know what "necessarily" means... it's just that the consensus (multiple articles) points to Apple being a bit cheeky. There are hundreds of time combinations they could use that don't block any numbers - why enter a market and coincidentally use a time stamp that's in line with - but just before - all of the traditional major players in the space? Why not 9:09:14 (announcement date)? Or 10:57:14 (reveal time)?The article is still speculative. Notice that the article offered an alternative explanation from The Loop's Dave Mark.
That's why I wrote "Not necessarily," as I'm recognizing that my theory is also speculative in terms of visual effects. If it were 10:10, the minute hand would be blocking the 2 in marketing pics. They're also doing the same thing with the second hand right between 1 and 2 in 12, and ditto for the complications.
Umm, the digital format doesn't display seconds anyway.
The significance is most likely a combination of many things listed in this thread, rather than any one reason as the sole significance, including paying homage to horology and the history of watchmaking. Apple isn't the only one using 10:09, and some even display 10:12.
Except it's not "Different" to be at 10:09 according to the link:
Bottom line, it's aesthetics as the article mentioned.
Those are all good theories but it's actually a little part of apple history. It's the time of day that Steve Jobs announced the first iPhone.
(I'm risking out-nerding you here
Nope. 9:41 was the time of day of the first iPhone announcement.
10:09 (or 10:10, or 10:08, etc) is common for watch catalog photos because it's a smiley, happy face. I'm sure this was mentioned in the links posted earlier.
I think the choice for something near 10:09, 10:10, or 10:11 for aesthetic reasons for analog faces. But they chose 10:09 because it's the most aesthetic for digital faces. 10:10 looks weird digitally.
This. It is for aesthetic reasons. For watches like "rolex" it does not block the name.
Or could it be that a group of people discussed all of these factors before arriving at 10:09. "Hey, we'll be a minute ahead!" "..yeah, and 10:09 looks better than 10:10 on digital displays..."