Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

TSE

macrumors 601
Original poster
My favorite and dream PowerPC is an impeccable iMac G3 “snow” color.

I was about 7 or 8 when it came out and remember my parents taking me to the Apple Store and sat me down at the Kids Game booth where there were 4 of these. I played Harry Potter the Sorcerers Stone while my mom and dad shopped for their computer.

Great memories and truly iconic design! Gorgeous and beautiful. There’s something about that 90’s design language and how it was constructed that was so cool. And it was one of the first Apple computers that utilized the white translucent plastic look it would have until they started using full aluminum everything.

How about you?!?!
 
I have an iMac G3 snow at 500mhz, and while I like it, I prefer the eMac G4s. Much faster, bigger sharper CRT display, better louder speakers, and far more capable for things like video and web browsing. I have a 700mhz eMac (great for OS 9 as it's one of the last models officially supported) but I really want a 1.25 or 1.42GHz eMac with super drive and I'd upgrade it with 2gb ram and SSD and Sorbet Leopard with Aquafox and PowerFox for web browsing and Coreplayer for 720p offline video playback.
 
I have an iMac G3 snow at 500mhz, and while I like it, I prefer the eMac G4s. Much faster, bigger sharper CRT display, better louder speakers, and far more capable for things like video and web browsing. I have a 700mhz eMac (great for OS 9 as it's one of the last models officially supported) but I really want a 1.25 or 1.42GHz eMac with super drive and I'd upgrade it with 2gb ram and SSD and Sorbet Leopard with Aquafox and PowerFox for web browsing and Coreplayer for 720p offline video playback.

That would be awesome! I love the eMac to. It’s better in almost every way. But there’s no denying the iMac G3 is the OG and for me it holds a special place in my heart. I never experienced an eMac in my life to be honest.
 
Ooo, this is a good question... I suppose I have a couple soft spots. Aesthetically, bar none, it's the iMac G4. I'm lucky to have scored a 20" and it's a beauty. Definitely the gem of my collection. From a tinkering/internals perspective, the G5 Quad. It's just such an enigma of a machine to me, and I don't even have one (I have a late '05 Dual, so same era). Ridiculously overengineered, bizarre choice when the Mac Pro was just around the corner, the last best grasp of PPC architecture. I also feel like it got the short end of the stick by being made obsolete in just a few years. Finally, of course, the Clamshell iBooks. I got into collecting in the first place trying to get all 5 colors. Still looking for a Key Lime! I also *want* to love the TiBooks, but those damn hinges...
 
Ooo, this is a good question... I suppose I have a couple soft spots. Aesthetically, bar none, it's the iMac G4. I'm lucky to have scored a 20" and it's a beauty. Definitely the gem of my collection. From a tinkering/internals perspective, the G5 Quad. It's just such an enigma of a machine to me, and I don't even have one (I have a late '05 Dual, so same era). Ridiculously overengineered, bizarre choice when the Mac Pro was just around the corner, the last best grasp of PPC architecture. I also feel like it got the short end of the stick by being made obsolete in just a few years. Finally, of course, the Clamshell iBooks. I got into collecting in the first place trying to get all 5 colors. Still looking for a Key Lime! I also *want* to love the TiBooks, but those damn hinges...
Everything is considered obsolete after several years now.
 
For as long as I've championed PowerPC I've always had eyes for, of all of them, the PowerBook G3 Kanga. To this day I do not know why for sure, but something about its presence as a sort of "transitional" machine has always piqued my interest.

As far as for PowerPC Macs I actually own, funnily enough it's probably the Power Macintosh G3 (Beige), for just about the same reason as the Kanga.
 
As I get older, I am finding that the question "What is your favorite…" contains a lot of nuance. I understand the question, particularly in the context here. Unfortunately, due to various differences, I have multiple favorites. There is NO one PowerPC Mac that I can point to that embodies everything I would consider a favorite (in the context you are asking).

So…

Favorite PowerPC laptop (beauty/fun): 17" PowerBook G4 1.0Ghz. The original 17". Seeing people haul those around at the time they came out, just wow! Beautiful and fun! Not powerful.

Favorite PowerPC desktop (beauty): PowerMac G4 Quicksilver. The ONLY Mac that EVER had me say to myself "I want that". Beautiful! Not fun to work on. Not powerful.

Favorite PowerPC desktop (power): 2.3DC PowerMac G5. I have owned a Quad and they are great, but my 2.3DC is air cooled and can do the same as the Quad. Powerful, but ugly. Yeah, sorry, I never cared for the G5 cheese grater design.

I suspect that I may change this one day if I can ever get my hands on a MDD. I've never had one of those, although I've always wanted one. Those aren't as pretty as the Quicksilver, but not ugly and it occurs to me that Apple learned it's lesson on internal design with that Mac.

I have never been interested in any iBook, iMac or eMac, or any of the older gray box types.
 
Well, except for the beauty part. 😉

😀 😀
If we had a class for beauty, I am in your camp - The Quicksilver Powermac G4. I don’t think there is a better companion to the acrylic plastics in the design language of that era … well except maybe a graphite. That is a pretty sharp machine next to a ACD Cinema Display too. 🙂

Alas ai had one choice. So hard 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: ak-78 and eyoungren
Cube, no the iMac G4...hhmmm... no maybe the Quicksilver or perhaps the MDD, well the G4 Titanium is also nice... And I do like the late 2005 G5s too. It seems I have some kind of difficulty with this matter... 🤔
Uhoh, you’ve caught retro Mac gear acquisition syndrome. There’s nothing you can do but move forward & keep buying old Macs now.

I recommend playing a lot of Tetris.
 
For desktops, I'm torn between the Blue and White G3, the first Mac which really caught my attention, and the Slot Loading iMac (in Indigo) my actual first Mac.

As for laptops, it's the G4 Titanium. I wasn't a fan of the design at first, but when I finally got one to play with, that completely changed. That system has a nice mix of old and new, and although it's quite fragile, as we all know, it definitely looks apart from anything else that came before or after it.

Honorable mentions:
G4 Cube, for its design (of course), and the Lombard/Pismo PowerBooks, for their expandability.
 
As I get older, I am finding that the question "What is your favorite…" contains a lot of nuance. I understand the question, particularly in the context here. Unfortunately, due to various differences, I have multiple favorites. There is NO one PowerPC Mac that I can point to that embodies everything I would consider a favorite (in the context you are asking).

So…

Favorite PowerPC laptop (beauty/fun): 17" PowerBook G4 1.0Ghz. The original 17". Seeing people haul those around at the time they came out, just wow! Beautiful and fun! Not powerful.

Favorite PowerPC desktop (beauty): PowerMac G4 Quicksilver. The ONLY Mac that EVER had me say to myself "I want that". Beautiful! Not fun to work on. Not powerful.

Favorite PowerPC desktop (power): 2.3DC PowerMac G5. I have owned a Quad and they are great, but my 2.3DC is air cooled and can do the same as the Quad. Powerful, but ugly. Yeah, sorry, I never cared for the G5 cheese grater design.

I suspect that I may change this one day if I can ever get my hands on a MDD. I've never had one of those, although I've always wanted one. Those aren't as pretty as the Quicksilver, but not ugly and it occurs to me that Apple learned it's lesson on internal design with that Mac.

I have never been interested in any iBook, iMac or eMac, or any of the older gray box types.

The MDD is noisy (though the QS isn’t particularly quiet either). The lesson Apple learned from later G4 desktops was to abandon the design entirely and replace it with a big case with multiple cooling zones. The original G4s were passively cooled, then wound up as ‘wind tunnels’ - airflow was always a compromise.

The QS is a gorgeous design - one of the prettiest ever computers. Don’t really care much for the G5 - might as well just get a 5,1. Looks the same externally, much faster, much better expansion, better internal layout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eyoungren
The MDD is noisy (though the QS isn’t particularly quiet either). The lesson Apple learned from later G4 desktops was to abandon the design entirely and replace it with a big case with multiple cooling zones. The original G4s were passively cooled, then wound up as ‘wind tunnels’ - airflow was always a compromise.

The QS is a gorgeous design - one of the prettiest ever computers. Don’t really care much for the G5 - might as well just get a 5,1. Looks the same externally, much faster, much better expansion, better internal layout.
Yes, I love the look of the QS. My complaint was that when I dropped in a 1.8Ghz Dual processor CPU, three video cards, a PCI SATA card, a FW400/800/USB 2.0 card, four large SATA drives and a second DVD drive, the Mac had insufficient cooling. Everything I did to rectify that did nothing. The Mac would consistently lock up after 15mins to an hour due to overheating. But I wasn't going to run it with the door down.

I am aware of the Windtunnel nature of the MDD, but I have to believe that Apple did a better job with internal cooling. And there are aftermarket PSUs that are much quieter. I've just never owned that Mac model.

I went to the G5 because it had everything stock that I was trying to do via customization to the QS. It even handled my video cards. All without heat issues. But yeah, I've never been a fan of the looks of this Mac. I couldn't afford a MP until 2020 when a 4,1 came into my $250 price range.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ak-78
Yes, I love the look of the QS. My complaint was that when I dropped in a 1.8Ghz Dual processor CPU, three video cards, a PCI SATA card, a FW400/800/USB 2.0 card, four large SATA drives and a second DVD drive, the Mac had insufficient cooling. Everything I did to rectify that did nothing. The Mac would consistently lock up after 15mins to an hour due to overheating. But I wasn't going to run it with the door down.

I am aware of the Windtunnel nature of the MDD, but I have to believe that Apple did a better job with internal cooling. And there are aftermarket PSUs that are much quieter. I've just never owned that Mac model.

I went to the G5 because it had everything stock that I was trying to do via customization to the QS. It even handled my video cards. All without heat issues. But yeah, I've never been a fan of the looks of this Mac. I couldn't afford a MP until 2020 when a 4,1 came into my $250 price range.

As you know, I've had one since 2020. I also had a dual 800 Quicksilver for some time concurrently before selling it (alongside almost all of my other PPC desktops) a couple of years ago. In my experience, the MDD was actually quieter than the QS by a wide margin because 20 minutes after the latter powered on its fans would always constantly roar no matter what you were doing, even after waking from sleep. Whether there was some type of issue with mine or it being a quirk of the dual 800s, I'm not sure, but even when I upgraded my MDD in 2021 with dual 1.42s and a copper heatsink, its fans never revved higher than a small amount based on load. On a side note, I later downgraded back to the single 1.25 as the dual 1.42s would occasionally lock up due to overheating, similarly to your QS.

I can also attest that the thermal engineering of the MDD was in fact better than its predecessors, with some caveats. The airflow through the processor is indeed much improved, and drives are cooled more effectively as well (if that was ever an issue). But the airflow through the PCI bay and GPU is actually worse than the QS because the two small PSU intake fans, the only things cooling both the cards and the elongated PSU, are mounted forward-parallel to the PCI bay rather than directly perpendicular as before. So while this does provide some method for hot air to escape the area rather than collect in one place, the design was about as effective as attempting to evacuate the vast amounts of heat that the G4 chips produced in the QS through the PSU mounted parallel right next to it, especially when you are taxing the GPU for prolonged periods of time.

To make matters worse, the PSU fans depend on being fed cool air from the case inlet fan mounted on the side door... on the opposite end of the chassis. In order to make this labyrinthine design work, Apple cut out an air channel across the optical drive cage for air to flow through and be sucked in by the PSU fans above, but this is hampered greatly when an additional optical drive has been installed in the lower bay. Which means the PSU fans alone are responsible for passively evacuating air from the PCI bay on top of cooling the already hot PSU with... more hot air from the PCI bay generated by both the cards and the PSU housing. This is almost certainly the predominant reason why so many of them failed over the years because their capacitors were constantly thermally stressed beyond their limits. And yes, the PCI brackets are perforated to allow access to outside air, but in practice this isn't nearly enough when your Radeon 9000 Pro is hitting 80C+ just from rendering a simple game because it has no other way to cool itself besides passively.

But all of that being said, if you replace the PSU fans with newer ones that can silently move a greater volume of air and also install a PCI fan to help cool the GPU if it isn't already actively-cooled, most of its issues get resolved and the MDD becomes an overall much more solidly-built system with many design improvements over the QS, including a front-mounted headphone jack, far more robust door latch (the door on my QS would always fall down, the MDD closes shut with a satisfying thud), significantly better ATX PSU compatibility, DDR support, and all the other spec upgrades and resulting perks as well, such as native support for both OS 9 and 10.5. So despite these shortcomings, it is probably therefore my favorite PPC system tied with the DC G5 as they are both the best of their respective eras.

Appearance-wise, whether it's edged out by the QS or the iMac G4, it is also objectively in the top three most beautiful computers regardless of who you ask:

DSC_0358.jpg

DSC_0455-1.jpg


The aforementioned usability improvements make it even sexier, in my opinion...

More photos (NSFW):

 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.