Most of the time it’s because everyone else around them does. Sadly you can’t exactly expect everyone you communicate with to all switch to something else just for you.I still don't understand why anyone uses this Facebook garbage.
Most of the time it’s because everyone else around them does. Sadly you can’t exactly expect everyone you communicate with to all switch to something else just for you.I still don't understand why anyone uses this Facebook garbage.
Telegram stores your messages on their servers, unencrypted by default. Signal does not.Yes... "encrypted" ... from Facebook. I'm sure we can trust them on that. Telegram is a much better alternative and a lot of people are flocking to it.
Do you mean the same company whose employees made decisions that resulted in the Cambridge Analytica scandal and countless others? Facebook can’t be trusted as far as I could kick ’em. Sounds like you’ve been drinking from the cool-aid and are not aware that these policies are made way over your head.I was right there with your line of thinking. Then I joined Facebook, and in particular WhatsApp. I know that you have no reason to trust me, but it’s really encrypted, and our servers collect the minimal amount of information to make the service work. We keep nothing else.
To take it a step further, every major change goes through a privacy review to ensue that we’re not storing any data that isn’t absolutely required.
So, why trust WhatsApp even though it’s from Meta over Telegram? We have dedicated employees to ensure that your data is safe. Do you think that there is a possible way that we can have the number of employees that we have and somehow not have it leaked that we’re actually doing evil things with your WhatsApp data?
Source: I’m a developer at WhatsApp
Yes, they store them unencrypted, but they are stored obfuscated on their servers in many different places by default, so that the data can't be put back together in any meaningful way. They have no data to give if asked. Their encryption just adds another layer of security to their obfuscation technique.Telegram stores your messages on their servers, unencrypted by default. Signal does not.
No, I don't expect that. It's just hopefulness.Most of the time it’s because everyone else around them does. Sadly you can’t exactly expect everyone you communicate with to all switch to something else just for you.
This is not true. Your message data is stored and can be accessed by Telegram. From their own FAQ:Yes, they store them unencrypted, but they are stored obfuscated on their servers in many different places by default, so that the data can't be put back together in any meaningful way. They have no data to give if asked. Their encryption just adds another layer of security to their obfuscation technique.
That's great. It can accompany, "I can keep a secret, but apparently the people I tell can't."The old adage applies here:
Two people can keep a secret if one is dead.
No service is 100% secure.
They also say this:This is not true. Your message data is stored and can be accessed by Telegram. From their own FAQ:
Q: Do you process data requests?
Secret chats use end-to-end encryption, thanks to which we don't have any data to disclose.
To protect the data that is not covered by end-to-end encryption, Telegram uses a distributed infrastructure. Cloud chat data is stored in multiple data centers around the globe that are controlled by different legal entities spread across different jurisdictions. The relevant decryption keys are split into parts and are never kept in the same place as the data they protect. As a result, several court orders from different jurisdictions are required to force us to give up any data.
The data is stored. It can be accessed.
If privacy is a concern, better to use Signal which is open source and never stores your messages on a server.
So what?They also say this:
3.3.1. Cloud chats
telegram is a cloud service. We store messages, photos, videos and documents from your cloud chats on our servers so that you can access your data from any of your devices anytime without having to rely on third-party backups. All data is stored heavily encrypted and the encryption keys in each case are stored in several other data centers in different jurisdictions. This way local engineers or physical intruders cannot get access to user data.
3.3.4. Public chats
in addition to private messages, telegram also supports public channels and public groups. All public chats are cloud chats (see section 3.3.1 above). Like everything on telegram, the data you post in public communities is encrypted, both in storage and in transit but everything you post in public will be accessible to everyone.
I was right there with your line of thinking. Then I joined Facebook, and in particular WhatsApp. I know that you have no reason to trust me, but it’s really encrypted, and our servers collect the minimal amount of information to make the service work. We keep nothing else.
To take it a step further, every major change goes through a privacy review to ensue that we’re not storing any data that isn’t absolutely required.
So, why trust WhatsApp even though it’s from Meta over Telegram? We have dedicated employees to ensure that your data is safe. Do you think that there is a possible way that we can have the number of employees that we have and somehow not have it leaked that we’re actually doing evil things with your WhatsApp data?
Source: I’m a developer at WhatsApp