Everybody should learn and take to heart the following motto: If a thing is free, you are the product
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
WhatsApp Readies Message Reactions for iPhone and Android
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Everybody should learn and take to heart the following motto: If a thing is free, you are the product
Splintering messaging into so many different channels isn't benefitting consumers. I have zero interest in having SMS/iMessage, WhatsApp, FB Messenger, Snapchat, etc all as messaging channels. That's just annoying, not better.
The nice thing about iMessage is that it's not a separate channel from a UI/UX standpoint. It's the reason it's acceptable.
Well, and the fact that it's not associated with Meta in any way, shape, or form.
It's really not that hard, and it's what should happen. The reason they're not integrated isn't a technical one; it's a business reason.
100% agree with this sentiment.
Often see people saying that if a product/service is free, you are the product. I find the sentiment you mentioned to be more moderate and realistic that the funding model of a company needs to be understood first before making blanket statements like that.
FOSS is a prime example of things being free yet not making the end-user the product.
Tell me exactly how Meta uses its users as a product.
Last edited:
Let me ask you, are you a software engineer? Even further, have you ever worked at a company that has over 2 billion monthly active users? You’re talking out of your ass with a false sense of confidence. You really think they didn’t weigh the technical perspective while justifying this business decision? Porting a feature from one completely different, massive system to another has a huge time (send therefore financial) cost.
Is that actually a legit question?
If you actually were asking that in earnest, every last bit of your information that Meta has is sold to advertisers. Social media activity feeds marketing on a massive scale. It all cross-pollinates between their subdivisions. Stuff you look at on Instagram will influence the ads you see on Facebook; things you discuss on WhatsApp/people you talk to will influence ads on any of their other platforms for all parties involved.
Hell, have you never realized that any of those "ten year challenges" memes where everybody shares how they looked a decade ago vs now is feeding AI facial recognition/machine learning on human aging? I'm pretty sure Facebook can break it all down based on thousands of points of criteria - does this person smoke? What brands do they purchase (your transactions are all shared at a deep level ultimately), do they drink frequently (photos with liquor), etc.
Last edited:
You have no clue what you’re talking about. Show me proof that Meta sells data to its advertisers and that WhatsApp messages are read and used for advertising.
Last edited:
How exactly do you think Facebook/Meta makes money? Good feelings? Likes/thumbs up? Meta is exactly like Google, like any other service you access for free on a daily basis; their revenue is pretty much all from advertisements.
There's literally a setting in Facebook where you can tell it to deliver less personalized ads, but it's all still cross-linked to some degree with other services all the time. Have you never seen related Amazon ads in FB to what you've recently purchased?
It's been proven that while Facebook isn't audibly listening to you via mic, it gathers data in plenty of other ways, often extremely voluntarily. People use their Facebook to log into other sites/services all the time for convenience.
Spotify - Web Player: Music for everyone
Spotify is a digital music service that gives you access to millions of songs.
gimletmedia.com
Are you that new to the internet? NOTHING that is free is actually free.
For someone who lives in Silicon Valley, you’re surprisingly illiterate on how advertising works.How exactly do you think Facebook/Meta makes money? Good feelings? Likes/thumbs up? Meta is exactly like Google, like any other service you access for free on a daily basis; their revenue is pretty much all from advertisements.
There's literally a setting in Facebook where you can tell it to deliver less personalized ads, but it's all still cross-linked to some degree with other services all the time. Have you never seen related Amazon ads in FB to what you've recently purchased?
It's been proven that while Facebook isn't audibly listening to you via mic, it gathers data in plenty of other ways, often extremely voluntarily. People use their Facebook to log into other sites/services all the time for convenience.
Spotify - Web Player: Music for everyone
Spotify is a digital music service that gives you access to millions of songs.
Are you that new to the internet? NOTHING that is free is actually free.
Once again, show me proof that the data Facebook collects of its users is sold to advertisers. Also show me proof that WhatsApp messages can be read and are used for advertising.
Last edited:
I would like to just assume Meta as just their ownership assertion afterall. It’s like franchise company operation; just share the same name but each one of them got their very own privilege respectively.
I think that user actually mean to say about option to control chat read receipts individually