Each time apple presents its new line of laptops, the premium resell shops are still stuck with the previous versions
it often happens that the high-end model of the previous generation becomes as cheap as the new mid-end model
and that's when u often get an interesting choice... a choice that many reviews about macbook pro don't even mention..
in this particular case...
i could choose between
macbook pro march 2009 15 inch (former high-end)
(2.66 ghz with 6 mb L2 cache, 512 mb geforce go 9600, firewire 800, removable battery, express card) (EDIT:: has SATA 3 Gbit/s, so in 2 years i can buy a sdd hard drive)
or
new macbook pro 15 inch (current mid-end)
(2.66 ghz with 3 mb L2 cache, 256 mb geforce go 9600, non removable battery, brighter screen, sd card) (EDIT:: and it only has SATA 1.5 Gbit/s)
they both were the same price 1700 euro
i chose the first one, because it got more horsepower
(gpu & cpu.. u can't replace those)
1)would u have made the same choice?
2) why doesn't any review make these comparisons?
it often happens that the high-end model of the previous generation becomes as cheap as the new mid-end model
and that's when u often get an interesting choice... a choice that many reviews about macbook pro don't even mention..
in this particular case...
i could choose between
macbook pro march 2009 15 inch (former high-end)
(2.66 ghz with 6 mb L2 cache, 512 mb geforce go 9600, firewire 800, removable battery, express card) (EDIT:: has SATA 3 Gbit/s, so in 2 years i can buy a sdd hard drive)
or
new macbook pro 15 inch (current mid-end)
(2.66 ghz with 3 mb L2 cache, 256 mb geforce go 9600, non removable battery, brighter screen, sd card) (EDIT:: and it only has SATA 1.5 Gbit/s)
they both were the same price 1700 euro
i chose the first one, because it got more horsepower
(gpu & cpu.. u can't replace those)
1)would u have made the same choice?
2) why doesn't any review make these comparisons?