I suspect products that don't have M4 by now will be moving to M5 built on the newer A18 architecture. The M4 is almost a year old and the A17 architecture is even older and doesn't support Wi-Fi 7.Was originally looking forward to the M4 Air since I upgraded to a 10gbps fiber line at home and a WiFi 7 router...
... then the M4 MBP drops with WiFi 6E still. Thanks, but no thanks. I'm pretty sure they won't do anything to upgrade the display (the only other main thing I'd care about) so the lack of a connectivity upgrade's a hard pass for me.
The M4 and the A18 already share a common architecture, they are both based on being fabricated from the N3E production line. The A17pro is based on the older N3B production line, which also produced the M3 chips.I suspect products that don't have M4 by now will be moving to M5 built on the newer A18 architecture. The M4 is almost a year old and the A17 architecture is even older and doesn't support Wi-Fi 7.
Thanks pksv. Insightful..C'mon, how are we supposed to know? M4 MBPs aren't in users' hands yet, you have to wait at least a week.
A new battery in your iMac will make it go 10% faster. Promise. Could have sworn we were talking MBA and MBP, but I digress. Why your Macs slow down after two years I have no idea. Perhaps try a clean install.No mention of battery in my comments. Never had an issue with any Mac battery.... especially not in iMacs, Minis![]()
Another person who read the article.Expecting the M4 Air by March 2024 and other models by WWDC.
Apparently the moderators found "frivolous" that I told you that I think the same as you (I literally said "same"), so let me rephrase this.I'm still very happy with my 2 year old M2 MBA and that will probably be more than sufficient for my needs for many years still (the battery will probably need replacing at some point though)
Hit me up when the M7 MBA is on the horizon. Who knows, we might even see a refreshed form factor by then
^^^ My thoughts exactly!It seems silly to me that we have to wait another 6 months for the M4 Max in a Studio when it's already available in the MacBook Pro.
There is just no reason to buy a Studio at the moment. (I suppose, unless it's massively discounted.)
I can tell you from my experience regarding AS vs Intel, go as much RAM as possible.Just want to know if a smaller amount of memory than what I currently have, is likely to be adequate in the new Macbooks.
It appears that upgrading memory in Apple Silicon is technically possible, though difficult: https://www.macrumors.com/2021/04/06/m1-mac-ram-and-ssd-upgrades-possible/. We already know that the SSD in the current Mac Pro is upgradeable. In addition to, or instead of eGPU support, it would be interesting if Apple allowed motherboard or chip upgrades, without replacing the entire Mac Pro chassis. Some may be likelier to upgrade from M2 to M3 or M4 every 1-3 years than to replace the entire computer, especially when there are no (or only minor) changes besides the SoC. I know this is very unlike Apple and likely not to happen, but it would be useful.The Mac Pro needs more differentiation from the Mac Studio. An M4 Extreme chip would provide that, though I think that it it is possible, Apple should look at adding support for upgradable memory to Apple Silicon Macs — at least the Mac Pro. Support for eGPUs, whether from nVidia or AMD, or from Apple itself, would be a nice addition. It also occurs to me that, while it would be expensive, Apple could consider offering the option of dual CPUs (i.e. two separate M4 Extremes mounted on a single motherboard) as they did with the Intel Mac Pro of yesteryear. I’m not sure how this would fundamentally differ from Apple’s current practice of creating the M2 Ultra by fusing two M2 Max chips, but I assume that there would be some performance losses and some engineering savings inherent in this approach.