No, TV's are not an option.
But they do! Samsung 40"Why? The reason that nobody makes a 40" monitor is because the market is too small to be worth it. You can just get an HDTV if you really need that large of a screen sitting 2 feet in front of you.
Why? The reason that nobody makes a 40" monitor is because the market is too small to be worth it. You can just get an HDTV if you really need that large of a screen sitting 2 feet in front of you.
Those aren't TVs and you didn't specify a minimum resolution.at 1366x768?
No, I'm not talking about these.
I know you said that, I asked why.As I said, TV's are not an option.
Apparently not, otherwise they'd be readily available. I assume since you're asking the question you've done your research and haven't found any.There are alot of professionals that can use this size monitor.
Then why aren't there more 40" monitors available?I don't believe the market is really that small.
Those aren't TVs and you didn't specify a minimum resolution.
I know you said that, I asked why.
Apparently not, otherwise they'd be readily available. I assume since you're asking the question you've done your research and haven't found any.
Then why aren't there more 40" monitors available?
The EYE-LCD5600QHD has a screen diagonal of 56" and a quadHD display resolution with 3840 x 2160 pixels.
at 1366x768?
No, I'm not talking about these.
I want a 34" 16/9 display with 3840x2160 and I want it now!
The first week with the 30" ACD was nice, the second week it was already too small. The need for larger displays / more screen real estate is definitely there, just look at the various people all over the internet that use more than just one 30" display.
The problem with larger screen is the height, though. Anything more than 50cm can get uncomfortable, which is why I asked for a 16/9 display.
What will you be using this for?