When will we hit 4.0 Ghz?

Discussion in 'Apple, Inc and Tech Industry' started by Zwhaler, Apr 27, 2007.

  1. Zwhaler, Apr 27, 2007
    Last edited: Oct 16, 2014

    Zwhaler macrumors 603

    Zwhaler

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2006
    #1
    It has been some time since the Pentium 4's were the top of the line, and as I am sure many of you remember, Intel's fastest P4 was 3.8 Ghz. Although it was very inefficent, you have to admit that it was clocked very high. When do you think we will see non high-end consumer chips that reach 4Ghz? I realize that Intel redesigned their chips to be way more efficient when they moved to the Core archetecture, but also lowered their Ghz numbers by quite a lot (even though they were faster than their higher gigahert counterparts using the older technology). Thoughts?

    edit: 2014, we now have a 4.0GHz option in the new iMac!
     
  2. Fearless Leader macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Location:
    Hoosiertown
    #2
    I don't think we will for a long time, if ever. You start running into issues of how time, electricity, and the universe work.
     
  3. Zwhaler thread starter macrumors 603

    Zwhaler

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2006
    #3
    You do have a point. I have seen YouTube Videos where people overclock their P4s to ranges of even 5Ghz, and they literally have massive tanks of CO2 that are permantly keeping the processers cooled. Unless we get new revolutionary cooling systems, it might not happen for awhile.
     
  4. Eric5h5 macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    #4
    4GHz? Pfft. IBM did 500 GHz last year. Of course, that was by cooling it down to nearly absolute zero. So get out your air conditioners. ;) (But even at room temperature, I believe it was still operating at around 350GHz.)

    --Eric
     
  5. johnee macrumors 6502a

    johnee

    #5
    The IBM Power6 processor is running at 5+ GHz. Although you said consumer...

    The power-frequency-work curves show CMOS technology doesn't have very long till it hits its peak. A processors is constantly being throttled up/down due to inability to keep them from evaporating.

    Not until new manufacturing technologies are mainstream will we see increased performance.

    CARBON NANOTUBES WILL SAVE THE WORLD! (but there are some other technologies that will be mainstream before cnt.)
     
  6. noaccess macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    #6
    Today's cellphones have chips with 2GHz clock speeds? :confused:
    *Looks at LG Chocolate on the desk*
    *Looks at iBook running at 1.42 GHz*

    Huh?
     
  7. johnee macrumors 6502a

    johnee

    #7
    I wonder it it's referring to the output frequency of the cell phone?

    EDIT : nope, cell phones use ~800 MHz to talk to the cell tower. The reporter was just stupid.
     
  8. Eric5h5 macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    #8
    Yes. Read the note at the very bottom.

    --Eric
     
  9. sycho macrumors 6502a

    sycho

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    #9
    :rolleyes: That 500GHz was just a transistor, not a processor.
     
  10. GFLPraxis macrumors 604

    GFLPraxis

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    #10
    Not for a while if multicore keeps taking off. It seems the more cores added, the lower the clock speed increase. We're going to get quad 3.5 GHz machines before we get single-4 GHz.

    A 4 GHz single-core Conroe is probably aleady possible (or Penryn in the future), but nobody cares because they'd rather have dual-3 GHz or quad-2.66.
     
  11. johnee macrumors 6502a

    johnee

    #11
    You're right. Intel is working on an 80 (?) core design, I think they have it working in the lab, right?
     
  12. noaccess macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    #12
    Or maybe it's both. The reporter was stupid and it was referring to output frequencies, which don't exceed 1,900 MHz in the US and 1,800 MHz in Europe and other places.

    At first I didn't want to doubt the reputable NY Times, but that didn't really go well.
     
  13. TheBobcat macrumors 6502

    TheBobcat

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2006
    Location:
    East Lansing, Michigan
    #13
    Computers will hit 4.0 when they stop drinking all night and actually study once and a while. It's all about how much work you put in.
     
  14. johnee macrumors 6502a

    johnee

    #14
    lol :D
     
  15. Willis macrumors 68020

    Willis

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2006
    Location:
    What feels like the middle of nowhere
    #15
    I dont think we will see it. Its all about energy efficiency yet more power per watt.

    I think the megahertz race is nearly done. Its the core race now
     
  16. psychofreak Retired

    psychofreak

    Joined:
    May 16, 2006
    Location:
    London
    #16
    As heat-lowering technology kicks off with new innovations, I think that we could well see 4.0Ghz machines :)
     
  17. verticalforce macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2007
    #17
    Damn, who cares about 4 ghz when the future is 100 cores all running at 2 ghz, doing 100 things at once...

    *drools*
     
  18. Fearless Leader macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Location:
    Hoosiertown
    #18

    He was obviously referring to the iphone, he has information we don't. Lets get him. Macrumors Members unite.
     
  19. Aranince macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2007
    Location:
    California
    #19
    Instead of upping the system speed...since thats bound to hit the limits anyway(more cores actually starts to cause slowdowns) Why not work on making the software faster and make it so it actually uses the hardware to its absolute top performance? And to be able to do that, you would have to only support one type of hardware.
     
  20. Bobdude161 macrumors 65816

    Bobdude161

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2006
    Location:
    N'Albany, Indiana
    #20
    In a Windows world, most ppl are not going to see this...
     
  21. The General macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2006
    #21
    I hit 4.2Ghz with my PC on my E6600 Core 2 Duo.

    Big deal.
     
  22. sam10685 macrumors 68000

    sam10685

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2006
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #22
    That probably will happen.
     
  23. yg17 macrumors G5

    yg17

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    #23
    Unless we're talking about a 4.0 blood alcohol content :D
     
  24. synth3tik macrumors 68040

    synth3tik

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2006
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    #24
    Don't hold your breath. Semiconductor companies have hit a wall at the current clock speeds. Thats why we are seeing all the 2 and 4 core machines.
     
  25. jdechko macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2004
    #25
    True, But before we can take advantage of the additional cores, the software developers are gonna have to rewrite their code. Most important apps still use a single core. So even though there are 24 total GHz of power available on the new 8-core macs, few apps can use it all. It comes down to what you need, a faster single proc. or multiple lower-clocked processors. I think it will be a combination of both (rewrite code, faster cores).
     

Share This Page