He only posted 3 questions marks. Lying about what someone posts just seems a bit.... ____
Anyway, you said there are "major improvement in R/W speeds" and that's why you went with the 13", because you can't justify the tradeoff in speed. But the truth is that there is no noticeable difference, none. I feel sympathy for you since you've been mislead, but please don't continue misleading others.
You feel sympathy for someone on a forum that did research and bought what he felt he needed? You need to get out more.
I would be startled if I ever met anybody who could tell the difference between the drives in a real-world scenario, hence my curiosity.
That Ars review was where I first read that, and I've since seen it one or two other places.
Being as my workload is dealing with heavy files on a daily basis while running several large apps at once, I think I'd actually notice the difference. Does it make a difference if all you do is email? 99.9% no; The heavier the workload, the more likely you're going to feel those microseconds.
The bottom line is this: If I bought the 11" I'd probably be okay with it because I'd never buy both sizes and use them consecutively just to prove my point to someone on a forum who throws around wild and un-researched opinions (not pointing fingers), but reading about the speed difference and knowing my usage is heavier than most users' I chose wisely. Most people - of whatever workload - only experience what they buy, and because most only upgrade their computers when they need to (e.g., 2-3+ years) any upgrade is going to be noticeable regardless of which model they choose.
I'm coming from a last-ten 17" - 4GB of RAM and a Sandy Bridge. Any post-Haswell machine would be a blast, but I opted to pack a couple "booster rockets" onto my blast so I can really fly with it. Plus if I'm spending $1300+ on something, I have a tendency to buy up.
Last edited: