I prefer the curved back of the 3g/s. Much more ergonomic.
Agreed. 3GS+ Retina+ LTE = profit. I do like my iPhone 4, but its just not ergonomic at all for me, at least.
I prefer the curved back of the 3g/s. Much more ergonomic.
OP is not asking about function. This was asked strictly for design. If both the first iPhone came out at the same time of the 4/4s and were both had similar specs, alot of people would pick the OG iPhone based on curves, that shiny chrome bezel, and a back that doesn't shatter from a 3ft drop. Only thing that would make it better on the back would be adding a glowing Apple logo like their MacBooks. People seem to be biased for what phone they currently use and the OG iPhone sold the least amount being it was expensive at the time. Less people experienced it while many more have with its successors.
Agreed. 3GS+ Retina+ LTE = profit. I do like my iPhone 4, but its just not ergonomic at all for me, at least.
The original was also impractical as phone signal doesn't pass through aluminium very well. Was a classic example of form before function.
I'm wondering what the reasoning is for the people that voted the iPhone 4 over the iPhone 4S.
Keep in mind that the 4S had the redesigned antenna to fix the issues with the 4's design, and the 4 eventually came in two layouts (GSM and CDMA) - Apple discovered the design/layout of the 4 needed to be changed.
I prefer the curved back of the 3g/s. Much more ergonomic.
Yeah, but it feels like cheap plastic.
The iPhone 4/4S design feels very "industrial."
Although the 4 is beautiful, it's not very practical. I think the overall best design was the original.
OP is not asking about function.
Don't really need to have different options for 3g/3gs and 4/4s they are the same design. 4/4s design is the best by far IMHO.
I agree, they are identical designs between them.