Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

scouser75

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Oct 7, 2008
3,033
666
Guys, I have to upgrade my Power Mac G5 because Apple so considerately have decided to drop all support for us poor G5 owners!!!

I now have to decide between a Mac Pro Quad 2.93ghz with 3GB Ram and 500GB HD OR an 2.26gz 8 Core Mac Pro with 500GB Ram.

My question is this... Which one would be better for Final Cut Studio 3 apps?

Would the Quad 2.93ghz be faster than the 8 Core 2.26ghz? Or would it be the other way round? I'm basing my judgement on the ghz speeds - the Quad having more ghz!

Apologies if my question sounds silly. I'm not too clued up when it comes to computer technicalities!

Also, I hear a small rumour that there may be possible updates in processors in September! Maybe even a minor casing design change. Anyone else heard these rumours?
 
Guys, I have to upgrade my Power Mac G5 because Apple so considerately have decided to drop all support for us poor G5 owners!!!

I now have to decide between a Mac Pro Quad 2.93ghz with 3GB Ram and 500GB HD OR an 2.26gz 8 Core Mac Pro with 500GB Ram.

My question is this... Which one would be better for Final Cut Studio 3 apps?

Would the Quad 2.93ghz be faster than the 8 Core 2.26ghz? Or would it be the other way round? I'm basing my judgement on the ghz speeds - the Quad having more ghz!

I think quad may be faster because there's no app that can fully use all 8 cores. If you want octo, go for 2.66GHz.

Also, I hear a small rumour that there may be possible updates in processors in September! Maybe even a minor casing design change. Anyone else heard these rumours?

Simply, no new CPUs exist (yes, there are faster Core i7s, up to 3.33GHz, but I doubt they'll be used). No update before mid 2010 (Gulftown).
 
Thanks Hellhammer.

Re no apps using all 8 cores... do you think buying the 8 core would make the purchase a little more "future proof" - although having read about those poor folk who bought Mac Pro's in 2008, when it comes to Apple there is no such thing as even 1 year proof!!!

If the Quads are faster than the 8 Cores, why do Apple charge more for the 8 cores?:confused:
 
Guys, I have to upgrade my Power Mac G5 because Apple so considerately have decided to drop all support for us poor G5 owners!!!

I now have to decide between a Mac Pro Quad 2.93ghz with 3GB Ram and 500GB HD OR an 2.26gz 8 Core Mac Pro with 500GB Ram.

My question is this... Which one would be better for Final Cut Studio 3 apps?

Would the Quad 2.93ghz be faster than the 8 Core 2.26ghz? Or would it be the other way round? I'm basing my judgement on the ghz speeds - the Quad having more ghz!

Apologies if my question sounds silly. I'm not too clued up when it comes to computer technicalities!

Also, I hear a small rumour that there may be possible updates in processors in September! Maybe even a minor casing design change. Anyone else heard these rumours?
This question gets asked daily. Here, take a look at this it might help even though it was posted a while back.

https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/691789/

In fact, if you like, bump the damn thing so others might benefit...
 
This question gets asked daily. Here, take a look at this it might help even though it was posted a while back.

https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/691789/

In fact, if you like, bump the damn thing so others might benefit...

Thanks mate. I'll go and bump that up the order after this :)

I've done a fair bit of Searching on here and most comparisons have been for PS4 and Logic. Nothing for Final Cut Studio 3 :rolleyes: But I'll bring this into the mix in the other thread :)
 
Quad will easily last ~3 years for you. Haswell should come out in 2012 and it'll have 8 cores by default meaning that we may see 32 core or even 64 core Mac Pro within few years
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.