Hi guys...
It's finally time for me to retire my ancient MacBook Pro (15-inch Early 2008) with something newer, but I'm torn over going with the 'Regular' vs. a Retina Display model. I'm a professional photographer and the Number One job for this is image capture. I regularly tether a Hasselblad h-series body using a 33mp Leaf Aptus 75 digital back (using Leaf Capture), so I'm pushing around a lotta data very quickly. I also occasionally tether Canon 5Dmkii's with CaptureOne Pro7. One other thing to consider is that I will probably be upgrading my digital back to either a 60mp or 80mp back within the next year or so, which will effectively double the size of the files I'll be shooting. I do occasionally hafta use Photoshop on the Macbook, but only when I'm pushed, since my usual workflow is to process & retouch on my Mac Pro when I get back to the studio.
My main concerns are the ability to calibrate the laptops screen in order to give me a realistic representation of what the images will look like when I load them onto the Mac Pro and my calibrated retouching monitors. For that reason, I have always stayed with matte screens on my laptops. I get conflicting opinions on whether it's possible to truly calibrate ANY glossy screen, let alone the Retina display. I know the Retina is super-groovy for watching videos, but all that contrast worries me if I can't tone it down.
The 2.7GHz Retina display model with its 16GB RAM and 512GB flash storage is very attractive at $2800.00. The comparable 2.6GHz matte-screened model with a 512GB SSD and only 8GB RAM is $2900.00...a hundred bucks more for a slightly slower processor and half the RAM kinda sucks. I'm pretty sure the 8GB RAM will be fine for the Leaf Capture program...especially since I'll be on an SSD...but Photoshop always runs faster/better/more stable with tons of RAM, so the 16GB on the Retina is a plus. But if that Retina screen can't be calibrated, that's probably not gonna matter.
So....opinions?!!
Thanks!
BT
It's finally time for me to retire my ancient MacBook Pro (15-inch Early 2008) with something newer, but I'm torn over going with the 'Regular' vs. a Retina Display model. I'm a professional photographer and the Number One job for this is image capture. I regularly tether a Hasselblad h-series body using a 33mp Leaf Aptus 75 digital back (using Leaf Capture), so I'm pushing around a lotta data very quickly. I also occasionally tether Canon 5Dmkii's with CaptureOne Pro7. One other thing to consider is that I will probably be upgrading my digital back to either a 60mp or 80mp back within the next year or so, which will effectively double the size of the files I'll be shooting. I do occasionally hafta use Photoshop on the Macbook, but only when I'm pushed, since my usual workflow is to process & retouch on my Mac Pro when I get back to the studio.
My main concerns are the ability to calibrate the laptops screen in order to give me a realistic representation of what the images will look like when I load them onto the Mac Pro and my calibrated retouching monitors. For that reason, I have always stayed with matte screens on my laptops. I get conflicting opinions on whether it's possible to truly calibrate ANY glossy screen, let alone the Retina display. I know the Retina is super-groovy for watching videos, but all that contrast worries me if I can't tone it down.
The 2.7GHz Retina display model with its 16GB RAM and 512GB flash storage is very attractive at $2800.00. The comparable 2.6GHz matte-screened model with a 512GB SSD and only 8GB RAM is $2900.00...a hundred bucks more for a slightly slower processor and half the RAM kinda sucks. I'm pretty sure the 8GB RAM will be fine for the Leaf Capture program...especially since I'll be on an SSD...but Photoshop always runs faster/better/more stable with tons of RAM, so the 16GB on the Retina is a plus. But if that Retina screen can't be calibrated, that's probably not gonna matter.
So....opinions?!!
Thanks!
BT