Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
...

Ok everyone here is arguing but I will give you the facts as I have tested. I went out and bought (about a year ago) a top of the line simulatenous dual band linksys, a top of the line simultaneous dual band Dlink, a time capsule and an airport extreme. I also had an old linksys WRT54GL. As for range even though the new ones all claimed to be super range the linksys, time capsule, airport extreme and wrt54gl were about the same, the dlink sucked horribly. So no advantage to the expensive routers. As for it just working the wrt54gl worked right away and has worked for years without needing reset, the expensive linksys worked fine also although it did need to be reset nearly every day, the dlink constantly needed to be reset and was crap, the apple routers worked right away and don't need to be reset also. The only problem with the apple routers is they keep telling me I have a double NAT and the only way to get around it is to do bridge mode when there is no other router lol. As for speed the dlink sucked again and the rest were ALL THE SAME. Thats right the simultaneous dual band wireless N routers were the same speed at 5ghz or 2.4ghz as the wrt54gl. Now that is a bit of a lie, they are faster if you are sitting right by the router but as soon as you pass a wall there is no differance at all. My current setup is a time capsule plugged into my wrt54gl (with wifi turned off), for some reason no matter what I do the time capsule has some serious setup issues unless I have my linksys router provide it with the connection and then just setup the time capusle as a bridge. It doesn't make sense, I have tried multiple times to get it to not do that, but in the end its easier to just have them both hooked up. Only reason I don't just use the linksys is because it doesn't support having a disk hooked up to it and so I wanted the time capusle for that and also because it doesn't have gigabit which I wanted for my HTPC
 
The only problem with the apple routers is they keep telling me I have a double NAT and the only way to get around it is to do bridge mode when there is no other router lol. As for speed the dlink sucked again and the rest were ALL THE SAME. Thats right the simultaneous dual band wireless N routers were the same speed at 5ghz or 2.4ghz as the wrt54gl.

Don't know your full setup but I've got an Airport Extreme in bridge mode because I've got another router. Otherwise I would have double NAT. If you have a cable modem, perhaps it is acting as a router as well.

Really hard to believe the WRT54GL (which I had) isn't slower than the wireless N routers. You are measuring between two systems on your LAN and not over the Internet? Internet speeds are almost always slower than G or N speeds.
 
Most DSL modem's by default will do NAT unless you set IT to bridge mode and let your router do the NATing
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.