Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Which Hard drive for my MBP 2.4?

  • 500gb samsung 5400~ 320$

    Votes: 8 40.0%
  • 320gb hitachi 7200~250$

    Votes: 12 60.0%

  • Total voters
    20

Vanarak19

macrumors 65816
Original poster
what do you all think...

500GB samsung 2.5" 8mb cache 5400RPM~320$ with fw800 enclosure

or

320 hitachi 2.5" 16mb cache 7200RPM?~
250$ with same enclosure


ive placed an order for the 320, but im just not sure... I use roughly 200GB with windows. But would like the extra space, but can I justify the cost?

the 320GB is a small percentage slower than the 500GB on paper, but once that 320 gets full, the 500 will nail it.
 
I don't even go over 70GB on my 250GB internal. I am a software developer so short speedy bursts of data read is what I need and 7200RPMs shine for that. Most designers doing a lot of video or image editing would need the larger capacity drives and do not really care much on the speed of the spindle as it will be thrashing constantly.
 
I really wouldnt get either until WD comes out with a 500GB. If you really want to ask though, get the 500GB. 320GB 7K will run really warm and drain power.
 
I really wouldnt get either until WD comes out with a 500GB. If you really want to ask though, get the 500GB. 320GB 7K will run really warm and drain power.
My Hitachi 7K320 runs cooler than the WD Scorpio 320 I had earlier, and it has the same power requirements as a 5400 RPM drive.
 
Are you happy with the combo? I just ordered the exact same.
I have the OWC USB/FW400/800 enclosure from a while ago. It now has my older WD Scorpio 320 in it. It's pricey but works great. It came with a pwr supply but I've never needed it. I run it FW800 bus-powered all the time to take SuperDuper! backups of my internal.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.