Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

m1stake

macrumors 68000
Jan 17, 2008
1,518
3
Philly
As far as cache goes, 8MB vs 16MB isn't a contest: they perform identically.

As far as RPM's go, the higher the RPM's, the faster the drive is. This is less pronounced on laptop drives because of the smaller platter area. I'd go with the 5400RPM part personally. It seems like size is really the most important factor, so you shouldn't worry about the nonexistent speed difference.
 

Maclver

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Nov 23, 2008
2,661
2,036
New Mexico
As far as cache goes, 8MB vs 16MB isn't a contest: they perform identically.

As far as RPM's go, the higher the RPM's, the faster the drive is. This is less pronounced on laptop drives because of the smaller platter area. I'd go with the 5400RPM part personally. It seems like size is really the most important factor, so you shouldn't worry about the nonexistent speed difference.

So the 16MB with the 7200 would not be a major speed diff?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.