Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
In the Keynote he was "hiding" the iMac showing only the corner and not the full side view. I guess Schiller is not only a fat, it's a fat liar.
 
Grams is a funny unit to deliver weight in, in my opinion. I know it works with a little finesse, it is just funny.
 
The graphic in the story got cut-off. Here's the full image...
;)
 

Attachments

  • mini-moore.jpg
    mini-moore.jpg
    79.7 KB · Views: 176
Last edited:
So let me understand this:

- The pad of paper used in the example weighs 226g;

- the irrelevant iPad Mini weighs 312g;

- therefore, the iPad Mini is "lighter" than a pad of paper?

These guys need some lessons in logic, really...what a pathetic article.

You need a lesson in "calm down it's just the internet".
 
Some grouches are posting here today! I liked this--I tend to compare stuff like this myself, and the visual makes it straightforward. Really puts the kindle in perspective, too. I'm always stunned how light that little gadget is.
 
What the *** is going on here :confused:
I second this. I think this new box is way more interesting and deserves to be on the front page. But no we get this as an article. WTF???

And here is the box I am talking about:

imac-box.jpg


----------

Grams is a funny unit to deliver weight in, in my opinion. I know it works with a little finesse, it is just funny.
Only funny to the few non metric countries.
 
I think we can all agree that Phil was right and this has been nothing but a which hunt.

Perhaps Which can change their name to Why or even Who cares.
 
The iPod touch and the iPad mini are two products where there should be one.

Halfway between the size of both to fit in a back/cargo pocket, soft round edge that doesn't dig into your hand, a retina display, cellular option, and max out the remaining space with battery.
 
I used to wonder what ipad 321g and coke 412g meant. But thanks to the infographic I can finally understand these abstruse mathematical constructs.
 
Is this something that has to be tested? I am pretty sure that any pad of paper you can buy online will list its dimensions and weight.
 
So let me understand this:

- The pad of paper used in the example weighs 226g;

- the irrelevant iPad Mini weighs 312g;

- therefore, the iPad Mini is "lighter" than a pad of paper?

These guys need some lessons in logic, really...what a pathetic article.

This is why we need the downvote button back. The fact that one of the top-rated comments comes from somebody who clearly didn't even read the article is just sad.
 
So let me understand this:

- The pad of paper used in the example weighs 226g;

- the irrelevant iPad Mini weighs 312g;

- therefore, the iPad Mini is "lighter" than a pad of paper?

These guys need some lessons in logic, really...what a pathetic article.

He didn't say "lighter than," and neither did the article. He said "as light as." Given that there is no "official weight" of a pad of paper, all you can say is, it's a reasonable idea of how much it weighs. Pick up a pad of paper. Now pick up one on a ring binder. Now a thicker one. Now a thinner one. There. It about the same weight as one of those. Jeez.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.