Which video player consumes the least battery?

Discussion in 'MacBook Pro' started by deepakvrao, Jun 20, 2015.

  1. deepakvrao macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2011
    Location:
    India
    #1
    Was wondering if VLC is a battery hog? Which would you guys suggest to use say on long flights?
     
  2. Vermifuge macrumors 6502

    Vermifuge

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2009
    #2
    I think its less about the video player and more about the CODEC and bit rate. but i could be wrong
     
  3. Queen6 macrumors 603

    Queen6

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2008
    Location:
    Enjoying Better Things
    #3
    Movist use less resources than VLC, by a fair margin

    Q-6
     
  4. johannnn macrumors 6502a

    johannnn

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Location:
    Sweden
  5. deepakvrao thread starter macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2011
    Location:
    India
  6. dusk007 macrumors 68040

    dusk007

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2009
    #6
    VLC allows for all kinds of post processing. Like you can sharpen, use different deinterlacing methods, change color/contrast/hue/brightness. It has a bit more variablity in the rendering and has some software elements to it.
    All other players that don't really have any options like MplayerX, Quicktime, Movist rank pretty evenly on the battery life scale.
    I am guessing quicktime would be the most efficient if there is any difference. But if FFmpeg is running its makes no difference which of the other players is really used.
    VLC just offers the best viewing experience. If you apply a sharpen filter on 720p content you can get it close to 1080p subjective quality. Or at least half way there. The filter needs quite a bit of cpu power though. Everything has a cost. Audio can also be adjusted if needed.

    VLC is still the best overall I think. The others I would only use for long on battery watching and there I would still prefer MplayerX over Movist.
     

Share This Page