If you just bought the cheapest Canon, jump to Nikon while you still have not invested much. D-range is one of those big fails of the entire Canon range at the moment. Grab a D3200 right now, and only buy FX glass with it (it may even be a great classic AIS prime for a few bucks), so you can go D600 in the future.
Howdy Blanka.
Well, after much more research, I had actually been wondering about shifting to Nikon for the D7000. It has consistently been rated higher by numerous sites and magazines over the Canon 7D. The 7D can take 2 frames more per second, but in most other regards, it's pretty close between the two of them, according to the lab tests. Except for the dynamic range where the D7000 is much better.
I suppose I am lucky that I haven't invested heavily in glass yet, so it doesn't actually matter which brand I go with. The current 1100D wont go to waste, it will become the kids camera, with me teaching them the basics of DSLR's with it.
What are others thoughts? I don't want to start a Nikon vs Canon war here folks, I have no allegiance to either camp. I merely want the best bang for my buck, which is a budget of around $1K for a body only. I will have to spend on good glass later on regardless of which brand I go with.
My need is for animals, nature, landscape, cityscapes, quirky stuff, macro and then finally, portraits as the lowest priority.