I kinda am.
But I'm also waiting to see whether Apple will surprise us with a 14-inch MacBook in the near future.
But I'm also waiting to see whether Apple will surprise us with a 14-inch MacBook in the near future.
I'll strongly consider an iPad Pro as my main computer once iOS gets one crucial feature: a real file system.
I want apps to be able to modify files that other apps make. Dragging and dropping resources between apps works for some things, but for any technical task ya need access to a file system. I'm a software developer, so I'd like a way for a text editor to be able to create programming files that other apps then act on (say, executing shell scripts or starting a web server).
Definitely, only if it ran OSX would I think about itIf it ran OS X sure . Running iOS it cannot replace my Mac.
No need to wait for the iPad pro, people who did not need OS X could have got an iPad Air 2 , more than capable
Two different operating systems. I doubt anyone would replace their Macs with an iPad Pro.
Nah. iPad Pro was the biggest embarrassment of the keynote. I couldn't think anything but Microsoft Surface Pro owners will laugh their asses off.I kinda am.
But I'm also waiting to see whether Apple will surprise us with a 14-inch MacBook in the near future.
Nah. iPad Pro was the biggest embarrassment of the keynote. I couldn't think anything but Microsoft Surface Pro owners will laugh their asses off.
Why, though? The SP3 manages less than 4 hours of battery life in low load situations like web browsing, and two and a half hours when it's under medium to high load. It's a good device in theory, but with that kind of battery life (and the weak touch support in software), it's not that great. It's heavy for a tablet, and gets hot like a stove.
Nah. iPad Pro was the biggest embarrassment of the keynote. I couldn't think anything but Microsoft Surface Pro owners will laugh their asses off.
I kinda am.
But I'm also waiting to see whether Apple will surprise us with a 14-inch MacBook in the near future.