Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

betabeta

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
If you always have your phone I can understand not wanting to pay the extra 70 or so, but if you think about it, even if you never activate LTE, you’re getting a ceramic back and double the storage.

plus it cones with the cool new nylon sports loop.

For me the ceramic back and double the storage from 8 to 16gb is well worth the extra money.
 
If you always have your phone I can understand not wanting to pay the extra 70 or so, but if you think about it, even if you never activate LTE, you’re getting a ceramic back and double the storage.

plus it cones with the cool new nylon sports loop.

For me the ceramic back and double the storage from 8 to 16gb is well worth the extra money.
I might, haven’t decided yet.
 
And it "should" have the ability to make 911 calls say if your on a run wo your phone or swimming near the beach and get sucked out a bit.
 
I am buying the LTE version because I want the new nylon loop band. (the Non-LTE do not come with that band option) I don't need another black sports band. I was going to buy a non-LTE and buy a new band separately for $50. So if I do that, there is only a $20 difference between the 2. So it is worth it for the extra storage and better back.
 
This is why I bought the LTE version. I have no intention of ever activating it but I had to buy it for the better quality watch.
 
This is why I bought the LTE version. I have no intention of ever activating it but I had to buy it for the better quality watch.

I At least like the idea that you don't have to activate LTE if you don't want to, even if that means you had to spend more money for the premium watch you wanted. But I see your point.
 
Can you buy the Cellular version and never setup/pay the monthly fee for it? I really want the stainless but don’t want cellular on the watch...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.