Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well Apple are going to have to reduce the features compared to those in the 5 or the new 5S, otherwise people will be paying a lot more (let's assume double) just for build quality. Siri may or may not be in there, I'm going to go with 'no'. Rumours of there being an NFC chip with fingerprint recognition are abound for the new 5S, and I very much doubt that would make it in to a budget phone considering it will aimed at emerging markets. I imagine it be a like an iphone 4, maybe with the chip from the 4S, but with the screen of the 5.
 
A low cost iphone doesn't make sense when you consider Apple's revenue stream.

They currently foot the costs of designing the software, hardware and processors, plus maintaining their free services (push, mail, icloud, imessage, siri, maps), and their iTunes/app store is only recently starting to see a profit.

All these are not cheap, and are only made possible from the obscene profits Apple makes on each iphone, plus all the nickel and diming from accessories. Likewise, because of their target demographics, I believe the consumers are far less likely to splurge on paid content, making increasing market share secondary in importance since Apple doesn't earn from advertising anyways.

Also, if these budget iphones are capable of accessing all the features of the latest IOS and run most apps, what incentive would there be for consumers in developed countries to spring for the higher-end models? I don't mind giving up siri and fingerprint authentication to save a few hundred dollars.

My advice to Apple is not to miss the forest for the trees. They already command the biggest profits in the industry, continue to focus on that.
 
If the low-cost iPhone has Retina, I don't care if its made out of cardboard, I'll be the first in line if it means I can buy a reasonably-priced iPhone without a contract.

And, btw, I have plenty enough money to buy a full-cost iPhone for each member of my family every year, but I'm also very financially responsible. It makes little financial sense to buy a cellphone at full cost.
 
A low cost iphone doesn't make sense when you consider Apple's revenue stream.

They currently foot the costs of designing the software, hardware and processors, plus maintaining their free services (push, mail, icloud, imessage, siri, maps), and their iTunes/app store is only recently starting to see a profit.

All these are not cheap, and are only made possible from the obscene profits Apple makes on each iphone...

I don't get how anyone thinks it doesn't make sense. You're thinking an inch in front of your nose, whereas Apple are playing the long game. India and China have 1/3 of the world's population, but only a fraction can afford the iPhone at it's current premium price. However, they are called emerging markets for a reason. In 10 years or so the amount of money availablae to each individual will be far more than it is today (well, that's the theory anyway) and the ratio of iPhone-to-budget-iPhone users will have shifted in favour of the more expensive product. You might pull out the old 'just release the iPhone 4' argument but that's still too expensive for most people in those regions, and Apple wants to consolidate their line-up with the bigger screens and lightening ports.

Think of it this way...it's what other companies do when they release a new consumer product. I'm not talking about computers here, think about chocolate bars. When a new one is released you'll find company people on the streets giving them out for free, or you'll see them in the shops with 'limited time only!' or 'special edition!' on them. It's to introduce you to it. If it sells, then great. It gets promoted to full-time chocolate bar. If not, the company can fall back on it being only a limited release or special edition. While Apple won't be doing that exactly, it gives the idea of 'introduction'.

Also, if these budget iphones are capable of accessing all the features of the latest IOS and run most apps, what incentive would there be for consumers in developed countries to spring for the higher-end models? I don't mind giving up siri and fingerprint authentication to save a few hundred dollars.

Yes, but some people won't. This is where Apple would have to play this part very carefully; limiting the capabilites enough to make you still want the premium version, but not enough to make it junk. I would happily pay half price for lack of siri and fingerprint recognition stuff. That novelty would wear off pretty quick anyway; I don't know anyone who actually uses Siri these days. As for the incentive for people to buy the 'premium' over 'budget' models, don't underestimate the power of status. That is a HUGE, and incredibly subtle, incentive for a lot of people.

I, like kas32, don't care if it's made out of cardboard, if it has retina. I could afford to buy 3 brand spanking new iPhones a month and it wouldn't even dent my salary. I'm just sensible when it comes to spening my money.

Alex
 
I think a low cost iPhone will make the profits go down because there are tons of people who use iPhones who will opt for the lower cost models. (The people who buy it as a status symbol or because its the 'cool' thing will pay the $349 or whatever instead of $649 if given the option... or pay $0 instead of $199 while still having the 'latest generation').

The very fact that people are clamoring for a low cost iPhone (including many present iPhone users) tells you they just want to pay less, so basically Apple fulfilling this will just result in less money for Apple. Sure it may bring a few people on the fence to the fold potentially, but let's be honest, the plan is whats expensive not the phone. I don't know too many people who given the ability to pay for an iPhone plan can't honestly afford the money to buy the actual unit (which is only like 20%-25% of the cost of ownership over two years if bought outright and maybe 10% of the total cost of ownership if on contract ($200 while the plan costs about ~$2,000)

It will also kill the secondary iPhone market. I would rather buy a brand new iPhone for $349 that may be missing a few luxury features than a used one for the same price because at least I get a warranty with Apple and know where the phone's been.
 
Last edited:
If the low-cost iPhone has Retina, I don't care if its made out of cardboard, I'll be the first in line if it means I can buy a reasonably-priced iPhone without a contract.

And, btw, I have plenty enough money to buy a full-cost iPhone for each member of my family every year, but I'm also very financially responsible. It makes little financial sense to buy a cellphone at full cost.

Exactly, which is why I find the Nexus very attractive. Are you on T-Mobile? They're great if you live in the city area.

----------

Maybe this is being overlooked, but how much would it cost to release an iPod Touch with a cellular radio? Cut down the storage space to 16GB, and they could probably sell it for $329.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.