Also maybe people still value the optical drive? We probably don't but I bet the majority of Craigslist browsers aren't as tech savvy as we are.
People seem to be offended by his terminology, but miles does make a good point and it might apply to the rMBP. In 2 years then will the value of the $2100+ rMBP take a significantly larger hit than the older yet more upgradable MBP's? Even though eBay is a community full of scavengers who gladly overpay for other People's junk, when the starting price point is that high then the dropoff in price will still alienate the typical value-seeking ebayers and the limited upgradability pushes away the pros in need of a used powerhouse.If that is the case miles01110 then will the new retina macbook pro suffer from the same lack of re-sale value as it's unable to be modified or upgraded as well?
Is the retina a throw-away machine?
In general I think that the resale value (compared to original purchase price) of upgraded / top-of-the-line machines is worse than the base models.
You pay a lot when you purchase one to go up to things like the top-spec processor and larger SSD, but people buying a used computer probably won't put as much value on those things.
That's exactly the case. Base models do keep more of their value, particularly on the MacBook Air line. Remember, the top models have the highest profit margins for Apple. The extra 4GB of RAM cost them about $20, but adds $100 to the purchase price. The i7 ads about $75 to the cost of the 11" (following Intel's list price), but $150 to the price. 2 years from now, both the 1.7GHz i5 and 2.0GHz i7 will seem out of date, so the i7 model won't fetch much more than the i5 model.
The 2012 Airs are really the first models with reasonable specs, so I don't foresee this being a problem moving forward.
I understand what you mean and agree thay 4GB is going to be good enough for most casual users. but The base model of the 2012 11" Air is 64GB and 13" is 128GB. We may find creative ways to justify and cram our data to fit those drives but Those are hardly "reasonable" siZes for long term usage and will heavily impact resale.The 2012 Airs are really the first models with reasonable specs, so I don't foresee this being a problem moving forward.
Man, it drives me nuts when people selling their older Mac's say that "new this cost me around $2000" or more.
Does that mean it is still worth $1000 or more being a two old mac?
It doesn't have as much to do with the purchase price as the current price. If you are referring to an Air that cost $1,799, when SSDs were quite pricey, then that was before the Air price came down. With the new Airs so affordable in the $1,100 to $1,600 range, of course a used Air will fetch $800-$1,000. The MBPs have been relatively stable in their price points. And not much has changed other than chipset, cpu speed, etc. The Air has also been upgraded, but SSD and other components have gotten cheaper, bringing the price down.
Would you buy a used Air for $1,300 when a new one cost the same or less. It's relative to prices of new machines. You can't look at it in terms of what that machine originally cost.
To them it is.
Before I bought my 2012 MBA, I looked online for a lightly used MBA. People wanted as much sometimes MORE for a used one.
I do agree that a Mac holds its value better than a Dell, but I am not going to spend the same on a used one when I can get a new one. Ridiculous.
This sums it up well, all I would add is that there are lots of stupid people who buy used. Still does not explain why one would pay more for a core 2 duo pro then a refurbished i5 with better specs and warranty.
----------
I've been bugging this guy on craigslist for a 20" g5 iMac, he is firm at $1000 lol. Then you have the people trying to sell there 2011 model as a 2012. With stupid buyers and dishonest sellers I guess anything is possible.
sorry I dipped on you guys, dad had surgery this morning, which btw went successful. This was definitely entertaining to read. I have a loaded 13 Air 2011 model I am trying to sell. I have a 2012 loaded 13 Air I just bought, I could have gone for the base retina but the extra weight was a pain. I would love to see a 13 pro retina at which point I would sell this Air and change over and probably have some money to get back in my pocket.
Amazing how the computer market has been evolving over the last couple decades. I remember buying my first computer a Packard Bell at Best Buy in 1996 for close to $3,500 WOW lol
People seem to be offended by his terminology, but miles does make a good point and it might apply to the rMBP. In 2 years then will the value of the $2100+ rMBP take a significantly larger hit than the older yet more upgradable MBP's? Even though eBay is a community full of scavengers who gladly overpay for other People's junk, when the starting price point is that high then the dropoff in price will still alienate the typical value-seeking ebayers and the limited upgradability pushes away the pros in need of a used powerhouse.
"Throw away machine" sounds demeaning for such new computers, but it does seem accurate in the eyes of the resale market.