No my point is that there many people to whom apple is targeting this device may already have netflix capable devices, be it a game console, or tv or some other appliance.
The bottom line is that apple-tv is not giving the tv aficionados any more then what they probably already are capable of, save a nice interface. What justification is there for someone to spend 99 bucks for that, when they already have capable devices in house
I just don't think this is a terribly important.
The bottom line is that Apple could have released a device that has a blu-ray drive, DVR, 500 GB hard drive, and the possibility of external USB-storage and your statement: "apple-tv is not giving the tv aficionados any more then what they probably already are capable of, save a nice interface," most likely continues to hold true.
The Apple TV continues to be a very limited, niche product as long as there are not fundamental changes in the way that networks and content providers do business (something that I do not think Apple, Google, or any other company at the moment has any real say in.)
I think it's more fruitful for Apple to offer a small, silent, and cheap device that offers movie rentals and seamlessly streams content from a computer to a TV rather than offer a "multi-tasker" for the same price as the old Apple TV.
By 2010, people have either been sold on the idea of having something in addition to a cable box and a DVD player or they haven't. A nice interface is not going to bring these people over into having a consul type device. A simple, cheap device that does a few things well might have more appeal.
To the larger point of the article, I don't see the rationale for focusing on one clearly peripheral interest for the company (a self-admitted peripheral interest) and an increasingly peripheral interest for the company (iPods.) Ironically, Apple is more a "computer" company now than it was a decade ago.
There are two areas where Apple is very comfortable with its relevance.
First, offering consumer appliances that run a desktop class OS, Mac OS X.
Second, offering consumer appliances that run a mobile class OS, iOS.
If there was ever a chance to challenge Apple in its core markets, it is now. It almost seems as if Apple has most of its resources now dedicated to the iPhone and iPad and everything else suffers.
The above quote is particularly ridiculous. The iPod nano is no longer a core market for Apple and the Apple TV has never been a core market for Apple.