Either way, it's a fowl.aloofman said:My guess is it would be ruled as some kind of intereference, the ball would be dead and runners can't advance. Probably ruled as no pitch, basically a do-over.
Either way, it's a fowl.aloofman said:My guess is it would be ruled as some kind of intereference, the ball would be dead and runners can't advance. Probably ruled as no pitch, basically a do-over.
Hail?cyberddot said:...Birds don't play baseball, and there isn't anything in the evolutionary past to prepare them for flying spheres...
xsedrinam said:Either way, it's a fowl.![]()
The article said that the batter swung and missed (duh), but was thrown out at first, since it was the third strike. HOWEVER,aloofman said:My guess is it would be ruled as some kind of intereference, the ball would be dead and runners can't advance. Probably ruled as no pitch, basically a do-over.
Umpires conferred on the bizarre happenings and ruled play should have stopped as soon as the bird was hit
2nyRiggz said:Well at least it wasn't a naked fan running across the field and got cracked open.
Birds dont get a break.....taste like chicken doesn't it
Bless
OutThere said:May I ask what that picture you attached is???
Sharewaredemon said:Anyone read the comment about the guy who hit a bird in 83?
WTF?
![]()
![]()
2nyRiggz said:Well at least it wasn't a naked fan running across the field and got cracked open.
Birds dont get a break.....taste like chicken doesn't it
Bless
One eye witness reported it was a goose.floriflee said:That picture was taken when Fabio was hit by a bird (pigeon, I think) while riding a roller coaster.