Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

FoxyKaye

macrumors 68000
Original poster
I saw this mentioned somewhere on one of the AirTag2 threads, and just encountered it ordering new CR2032 batteries online: Is "Compatible with AirTag" suddenly a thing? Wouldn't *any* CR2032 battery be compatible with an AirTag, or has something changed that I missed? Thanks for any thoughts on this!
 
I think they are referring to the "bitter" coating some batteries have. The idea is the coating tastes horrible, so a child would spit out the battery rather than potentially swallow it.

That bitter coating interferes with the electrical connection in Airtags, so bitter coated batteries won't work.

I spent an hour one day fussing with trying to replace an Airtag battery before I stumbled onto the solution in a Google search. I was able to get the Duracell battery I bought to work by cleaning the bitter coating off with alcohol.

If you search Amazon, you can find batteries without the bitter coating.

 
@Weaselboy has it right, but specifically - "Made for AirTags" may indicate that it DOES have a bitterant coating AND is compatible. This article gives a little more detail.

I assume the way they make it "compatible" is to use bitterant coating on some areas, and keep it off others. Not totally sure about that though.
 
Good question. Technically any CR2032 should work in an AirTag.
The “Compatible with AirTag” label is mostly marketing, but Apple does recommend avoiding cells with coatings/additives that can damage the contacts. Sticking with reputable brands usually avoids issues.
Curious if anyone has actually seen problems with generic cells.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mnunm
You could just lick off the coating.
OK, true story: I wanted to see if it was truly as awful (and therefore, supposedly preventative of ingestion by babies) as it claims. So on a dare from my son (in exchange for a Starbucks), I *did* give one of the batteries a lick, and HOLY COW, it is bitter, nasty, and lingers. Our entire family got a really good laugh, so I guess, yay for product safety? LOL
 
OK, true story: I wanted to see if it was truly as awful (and therefore, supposedly preventative of ingestion by babies) as it claims. So on a dare from my son (in exchange for a Starbucks), I *did* give one of the batteries a lick, and HOLY COW, it is bitter, nasty, and lingers. Our entire family got a really good laugh, so I guess, yay for product safety? LOL
Taking one for the team!
 
mmmm... batteries.

homer-simpsons-drooling-0hsusyksipe9bjn2.webp
 
OK, true story: I wanted to see if it was truly as awful (and therefore, supposedly preventative of ingestion by babies) as it claims. So on a dare from my son (in exchange for a Starbucks), I *did* give one of the batteries a lick, and HOLY COW, it is bitter, nasty, and lingers. Our entire family got a really good laugh, so I guess, yay for product safety? LOL
I also tried a bit ago. I hadn't really paid attention to packaging. And when I saw "Child Secure with bitter coating" I though hmm, I wonder... yeah not good. lol
 
  • Haha
Reactions: FoxyKaye
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.