Why?
Just buy the HD version and slap in the X25
or whatever.
Get a cheap $10 USB external case for the HD for backups
Take a look at the new Intel X25-M SSD, its performance is astounding
link
Why didn't Apple use these new performance monsters? I have to say I'm quite disappointed with the new MBP's because of this and other reasons.
How do you know they didn't? I'm furiously trying to find out which SSD they use. Do you know which one they use? Where did you get that info?
you have to do a search using the full product ID for the X25
SSDSA2MH080G1C5
You can find this on Intel's site or some 'completed' Ebay's deals (How I found it)
There's nothing shady about it they are just niche and very new.
I would definitely get one if they where $300 to $400 (which I'm thinkin they might fall to ..... eventually
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B001F4YIYY...e=380337&creativeASIN=B001F4YIYY&linkCode=asn
Thanks for the info, but I know of the drive, and I know it's probably the best performance for that price you can get currently.
But I wanna know how jaytv111 knows that Apple DOES NOT use these in the new MB(P). If he knows why they didn't, he probably knows which drive they DO use. And I wanna know which they DO use, so I can make some price/performance comparisons![]()
because the drives Apple uses are 128 Gb and not 80 Gb or 160 Gb as another poster pointed out.
Yeah, he just posted it when I was typing my reply
I saw this Japanese site which has a list of POSSIBLE 128-GB SSDs (translated link). I too recon that the Samsung is the most obvious choice, but who will give the real answer? Who has taken a snapshot of the system profiler on a new MB(P) with SSD
According to the Samsung SSD site (link) the 128 GB is an MLC, which is ofcourse good.
Another Samsung site (link) shows als a 1,8" version (for the MBA?) and a 'slim' version. What could that be ?