A few reasons that apply to the market as a whole, rather than the iPhone:
Many of these points refer to historically lower costs in Europe - I'm really just trying to say that for people over here a smartphone represents a significant increase in expenditure over a regular phone, compared to the US market where bills have traditionally been higher because of the way the market is structured.
Subsidies seem like a red herring to me, purely because they do still exist in Europe, and if you're comparing like for like, they usually work out cheaper than the equivalent US plans.
- People make fewer voice calls in Europe than in the US, so the idea of spending so much on a phone has always seemed alien
- Having much smaller countries meant that people never needed to spend money on "long distance", and in most cases "long distance" didn't apply to the mobile market anyway, so costs were lower here to start with
- Family plans don't really exist here, so the expenditure on a phone contract becomes an individual charge, rather than one for the whole family
- People don't pay to receive calls or messages, so they consequently need lower allowances
- People here do seem to be more "value aware". There are Android phones or Windows phones that can do most things an iPhone can. How it looks or the brand do not matter
Many of these points refer to historically lower costs in Europe - I'm really just trying to say that for people over here a smartphone represents a significant increase in expenditure over a regular phone, compared to the US market where bills have traditionally been higher because of the way the market is structured.
Subsidies seem like a red herring to me, purely because they do still exist in Europe, and if you're comparing like for like, they usually work out cheaper than the equivalent US plans.