People update apps everyday bigger than that by the millions. Not a very good explanation.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why doesn't Apple allow backups and upgrades without WiFi?
- Thread starter zorinlynx
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Generally not at the same time and far from as many people as would do a software update once its released as many people barely even update apps at all on a consistent basis. It's similar, but not the same.
U have to understand Apple's mojo.
Apple tells people what they think they want. Not the other way around.
U less there is huge consumer demand asking Apple for manually cellular backup option. Apple won't listen unless it hurts their bottom line (i.e. See 5.5 inch iPhone finally).
Just providing possibilities. Someone not liking them doesn't change that they are possibilities and the limitations are still in place.
Apple should just make it wifi by default and have an option to use your data. 95% of people use the default anyway.
Not at all. If I remember correctly iPhones will download the latest version of iOS over WiFi when it is released as long as you have enough space available.
So say Apple gets rid of the WiFi restriction and then releases an iOS update that is 120MB. As soon as they release that update every iPhone that is out there (with free space) would start downloading it. That is millions and millions of iPhones.
Compare that to an app update that is 120MB. What are the chances that every iPhone out there has that app installed, and has auto update turned on? The vast majority of apps are only going to be on a fraction of the phones out there, and even out of those many people would likely have auto update turned off. So even if both updates are the same 120MB, the iOS update is going to get downloaded by a much larger amount of people at the exact same time, and put a much larger load on the cellular networks.
There would be a few apps like YouTube and Facebook that are on a large percentage of phones, so those apps could come close, but still not hit the networks as hard as an iOS update.
In what situation would one need to update so badly that one could not wait to get on a wifi network.
Makes no sense. App downloads and software downloads are randomized precisely not to start downloading it at once all around the world slamming servers.
There is exactly 0 real explanations why I need wifi for a software update under 100 MB.
Yes, this is getting annoying. Sure, downloading more than 100MB apps was detrimental when data plans were in the hundreds of megabytes range. However, it's a bit backward when many data plans are in the gigabytes. This is even more annoying in developing countries where sometimes the only internet is the cellular wireless.
At the same time, I understand Apple's stance. Putting this restriction is easier than having to deal with the complaints. Until consumers put their complaints and demands to the wireless carriers instead of Apple, I am afraid this won't change.
At the same time, I understand Apple's stance. Putting this restriction is easier than having to deal with the complaints. Until consumers put their complaints and demands to the wireless carriers instead of Apple, I am afraid this won't change.