Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

waloshin

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Oct 9, 2008
3,339
173
Why doesn't the D7000 record 1080p 30 fps , but the slightly newer D5100 with the same sensor and processor does. Doesn't this mean that Nikon could enable 30 fps for 1080p with a firmware upgrade?

Edit:

Was the 24p cap on video recording done on purpose as the camera is marketed at higher end users then the D5100?
 
Last edited:

upbraid

macrumors member
Apr 24, 2011
62
0
seems like nikon overlooked this. its pretty sad when the firmware came out last april didn't fix this even though people wanted 30fps. perhaps the next update might give the d7000 30fps @ 1080..
 

waloshin

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Oct 9, 2008
3,339
173
seems like nikon overlooked this. its pretty sad when the firmware came out last april didn't fix this even though people wanted 30fps. perhaps the next update might give the d7000 30fps @ 1080..

Maybe the D7100?
 

HishamAkhtar

macrumors 6502a
Oct 22, 2011
510
1
seems like nikon overlooked this. its pretty sad when the firmware came out last april didn't fix this even though people wanted 30fps. perhaps the next update might give the d7000 30fps @ 1080..

Any news of whether they fixed this?
 

joepunk

macrumors 68030
Aug 5, 2004
2,553
13
a profane existence
For sure there is nothing to fix (hardware wise) but if Canon can release firmware updates to it's EOS 7D that includes "Improved continuous-shooting buffer depth (to 25 Raws, up from the original 15), customizable Auto ISO, control of audio recording level for video and the ability to re-process Raws and rate images in-camera. The update also enables the use of the GP-E2 GPS module."

Then I would think that Nikon could at least do something. Higher continuous-shooting buffer would be nice.
 

admwright

macrumors regular
Sep 11, 2008
243
53
Scotland
"Improved continuous-shooting buffer depth (to 25 Raws, up from the original 15),
Then I would think that Nikon could at least do something. Higher continuous-shooting buffer would be nice.

But the hardware buffer is fixed in a camera. So possibly Canon have found some way to 'optimise' the data going in to the buffer or there was an artificial limit built in to the software. If Nikon have fully 'optimised' data and are using the full buffer capacity then how can a firmware update give more buffer depth? It does not seem possible.

Andrew W.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.