Why has the iPhone stopped people from buying actual cameras?

Discussion in 'iPhone' started by iPhone7ate9, Sep 13, 2014.

  1. iPhone7ate9 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2014
    #1
    I'm just a little surprised. I mean I know the iPhone has taken over since people can take quick snapshots anywhere they want, but people also voice how much a good camera means to them yet things like optical image stabilization and actual optical zoom have been in cameras for decades. I know not everyone wants to take it with them but for things like vacations and first moments with children etc it just baffles me.

    It's kind of funny how they talk about how the aperture on the iPhone went from F2.4 to F2.2. The full frame equivalent of those apertures would be like F14 to F13.
     
  2. EvilEvil macrumors 6502a

    EvilEvil

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Location:
    New York City
    #2
    Most people actually don't know how to take good photos not to mention don't want to carry around big DLSRs.
     
  3. thisdj78 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2014
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    #3
    Honestly, my digital camera has stayed in my drawer ever since I got a 4S in '11. I used my camera once for a trip to Europe and that's it.
     
  4. dcorban macrumors 6502a

    dcorban

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    #4
    The best camera is the one you have with you.

    I am moderately into photography. I have owned upper end point and shoots (Canon S95, S100, etc). Sure, the photos looked great, but I missed many shots because I didn't have my camera with me or my battery needed charged. Since the iPhone 5 camera, I have only bothered to pull out my Canon twice, and have since sold it.
     
  5. iPhone7ate9 thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2014
    #5
    You can buy a small compact and get OIS and zoom.
     
  6. Cool Pup macrumors 6502a

    Cool Pup

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    #6
    Absolutely. And the iPhone has a fantastic camera.
     
  7. Mindbender14 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2014
    #7
    Convenience and the principle of good enough.
     
  8. cynics macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2012
    #8
    Its funny because people don't have any idea what they are talking about when it comes to aperture.
     
  9. Menel macrumors 603

    Menel

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Location:
    ATL
    #9
    iPhone can top many, most point and shoots. Thats what most people would have in replacement of it. The masses dont understand aperture, focal length, shutter speed, and more importantly how they relate. For them, iPhone is good enough. Their loss.

    Full frame equivalent aperture is non-sensical. I dont know what you are trying to say. Aperture, f stop is a ratio of aperture size to lens length. Thus it is already compensated for 'equivalency'...

    Focal length is often compensated for based on sensor size... In order to understand a 35mm equivalent focal length...
     
  10. iMas70 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2012
    Location:
    MA
    #10
    I slowly made the transition from a regular camera to digital in the late '90s. My digital gets a lot less use now. Mostly use my iPhone because it's always with me and it takes good pics.
     
  11. Whtchdr macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2013
    #11
    The iPhone and phones like it have simply replaced the lower end of the camera market. Like one of the posters said though, the best camera you have is the one you have with you. And I would also add that most people just want to be able to capture a special moment and aren't worried about the quality so much. I have a Sony Alpha a6000, but it is only useful for pre-planned occasions as it will definitely not fit in my pocket.
     
  12. leenak macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2011
    #12
    A few months ago I went to Italy. I took my Canon Powershot elph 310 which is a nice portable camera. On the first day of the trip, the lense had a critical failure . For the rest of the trip, I used my iPhone. We had debated taking the camera in the first place but figured we'd feel more comfortable giving a camera rather than my phone to strangers to take pictures with. The thing is everyone was taking pictures with iPhones there. (And the trick I figured out quickly is look for a couple that is taking a picture, ask if they want their picture taken and then ask to have your picture taken).
     
  13. gadget123 macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2011
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    #13
    I got a bridge camera earlier in the year I sold it. I will say why well to take decent pictures I felt I needed a DLSR and I couldn't afford that for now.

    I had to stop and take photos with the bridge camera the Iphone can snap good and sometimes better photos than the camera which required more technique. My 8mp Iphone pictures looked better than most of my 16mp ones.

    All I will say is a camera is capable of capturing much warmer and deeper colours where as phones tend to look more washed out.
     
  14. CEmajr macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2012
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    #14
    I stopped using my digital camera once I got the 4S. That's when the pictures the iPhone could take became "good enough" for me.

    I'm not into photography on a technical level and couldn't care less about the terms or what they mean. If the pictures look good then I'm good. So the need for a standalone camera is gone. Mine sat in a drawer for about a year then I finally sold it in 2012.
     
  15. ZBoater macrumors G3

    ZBoater

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Location:
    Sunny Florida
    #15
    For most people, taking a picture is half of the equation. Sharing it with someone else is the other half. In this the iPhone excels.
     
  16. Prise macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2008
    #16
    I'm not a photo enthusiast and have no desire to become one. I prefer to travel as unencumbered as possible, and with only my wallet and phone, whenever possible.

    If I even had a camera, it would be of no use, since it would never leave my house.
     
  17. scaredpoet macrumors 604

    scaredpoet

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    #17
    Yes you can, but then you have to carry it in your pocket, all the time, to capture any spontaneous moments. You have to keep batteries charged. And then you have to contend with the fact that if you want to share those pictures on social media, you're going to have to either go to a laptop or desktop to extract those photos, or connect to a media kit on your iPhone or iPad.

    Ooooorrr... you can just carry and use your iPhone. For the vast majority of casual users, the iPhone camera (and the cameras on other smartphones too) is "good enough," and since you're already carrying your phone, it's always with you. And even more professional photographers are finding ways to be creative with it too.

    I still have a dSLR myself that I use now and then, but it's really for events where I'm planning in advance to take a lot of photos.
     
  18. kevink2 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    #18
    When I go on trips, I take my phone and 1 or 2 other cameras.

    The advantage of my iPhone is it stores the GPS location of the picture. So I try to take at least 1 picture with it at a site so it shows up on my map on the computer. The other cameras, with much bigger storage, can hold more pictures than I can take on a trip.
     
  19. 1Zach1 macrumors 65816

    1Zach1

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2008
    Location:
    Northern Va
    #19
    Smartphones and mirrorless systems are hurting the Point and Shoot market coming and going, that's about it.
     
  20. petvas macrumors 601

    petvas

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2006
    Location:
    Mannheim, Germany
    #20
    I am happy with the quality of the pictures my iPhone takes, so there is no need for a dedicated camera. Sometimes though, before going on a big trip, I buy a great big camera, use it in the trip and then send it back :)
     
  21. shortcrust macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2008
    #21
    I don't know what that means. I do know that I'm happy with the photos my iPhone takes.
     
  22. indychris macrumors 6502

    indychris

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Location:
    Fort Wayne, IN
    #22
    There's no way in hades that my iPhone can compare to the quality shot I get with my D300, but neither can my D300 compare in portability and all around always-have-it-with-you convenience. Therefore, when I know I'm going to be out and about in places where I will likely have good opportunities for quality pictures, my Nikon goes with me. When I'm just out and about with the family, watching the kids at school sports events, etc., the iphone is the only thing I have.
     
  23. iPhone7ate9 thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2014
    #23
    But see you DO have a nice camera, you aren't the ones I'm talking about.
     
  24. indychris macrumors 6502

    indychris

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Location:
    Fort Wayne, IN
    #24
    But apple didn't reference high quality DSLRs. At least their keynote specifically noted point-and-shoots. I think that's a totally different realm, and the one that phones largely have replaced for many people. I have to point-and-shoots that I haven't used in two years except for some underwater shots with my Panny Lumix waterproof.
     
  25. Steve686 macrumors 68030

    Steve686

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Location:
    US>FL>Miami/Dade>Sunny Isles Beach>Condo
    #25
    For almost the same reasons most of us don't carry a CD player around to listen to music. The iPhone camera is more portable, storable, and less conspicuous while having a slight quality hit versus many DSLR models.

    I think I recall some large prominent newspapers actually gutted their photography staffs in favor of having field reporters use iPhone cameras for publishable story photos. If the pros feel these cameras are good enough in the news industry, Instagram-ers and Facebookers have much more camera than required.
     

Share This Page