1. Devices out there that track HR constantly barely qualify as a smart watches and qualify more as dedicated fitness trackers. Fitbit, Garmin etc.
2. Performance seems to be a common problem among smart watches right now and is not unique to the Apple watch. Apps that have to wait for data from a phone take a while to load. My Pebble prior even had this issue.
3. Expensive? The new Samsung Gear 2 is $349.99. The new Pebble Time is $250.00.
4. Yes, allowing 3rd party watch faces IS a new feature assuming you understand what a "feature" is.
You can stop pretending to be a tech blogger. They actually do research before they drop reviews.
Not really you can't tell me Microsoft band 1+2 are purely fitness trackers where you can add several apps etc. Hmm what about the Fitbit surge it shows calls and emails calendar etc.
Have you ever used an android wear device? It's speedy as hell well optimised. Why do you think Apple was in a rush to drop watchOS so fast after watch release? Performance issues still plague the watch just read the forums.
Of course it's expensive I'm from the uk the basic 38mm version costs £300 here. Pebble time is £130. Gear 2 costs £200-250 here. So hmm I guess it is the most expensive. Microsoft band 2 is £180.
So there's my research. And I'm not pretending to be anything. Nice assumption buddy.
Lastly I'm not hating the watch simply sharing my opinion just like I shared my opinion when I got and returned the iPhone 6plus but I raved about the 6s and how Apple is finally going in the right direction.
Last edited: