exactly ...and how many of them buy tons of DVDs and CDs and want to play or rip them on a computer? 1/10 of 1% if that.And how many of those old ladies are rushing out to buy each brand new macbook pro?
exactly ...and how many of them buy tons of DVDs and CDs and want to play or rip them on a computer? 1/10 of 1% if that.And how many of those old ladies are rushing out to buy each brand new macbook pro?
A similar discussion occured among many Apple fans in 1998 when the iMac was released without a floppy drive, I would think. If you needed, you could have bought an external floppy drive.
I'm sixteen, and I buy CDs all the time. I buy them because I want to support the artist, not an online distributor. I use my optical drive for that, and I watch movies with it. My internet is nowhere near fast enough for me to download movies. Too much of a hassle.
I posted a similar topic on a music forum here. The responses are the complete opposite of this forum. Obviously, CDs are not "deadtech" (ridiculous) and will be around for a while.
I'm seriously baffled by this, and I hope that for at least the next five years I'll be able to buy new Macs without being forced to give up my DVD collection. I mean, what is Apple thinking? Are they completely out of touch with reality? Do they think that everybody has internet connections that allow them to transfer 2GB films to their friends in <5 minutes?
If a family wants to send a home movie to their family, is Apple saying they should no longer use iMovie and iDVD, but simply send it over the internet? And what about watching films? DVDs look better than quicktime files that are 720x480, because their bitrate is much higher. To supply non-physical films that are in decent quality it has to be at least 720p. If people can't download that in under ten minutes, they're going to still prefer a disk. And what about all the thousands of films and DVDs that aren't coming to blu-ray anytime soon, and aren't going to be available as digital downloads anytime soon? (And Apple isn't even supplying Blu-Ray players in their machines!)
The internet is just not fast enough yet, to phase out physical media. They need to wait until the AVERAGE connection speed around the US is at least 100mb down.
Why is Apple doing this? The vast majority of the public at this point will say "hell no!" to phasing out DVD usage. Is apple trying to pull the baby out of the womb at 6 months?
The public will be made ready. Apple gets them ready.
The last thing you should do is rely on "the public" to move tech forward.
My area has no highspeed...still.
Tired of all this cloud bs, I could barely load google on the dial up we had. Im fine for slicing it out of the comp, but include it in the sale.
I'm sixteen, and I buy CDs all the time. I buy them because I want to support the artist, not an online distributor. I use my optical drive for that, and I watch movies with it. My internet is nowhere near fast enough for me to download movies. Too much of a hassle.
satellite?
better invent a time machine then. this stuff is the future of computing.
The artist is making the same amount from the CD or the internet. If you buy off iTunes, some goes to the artist, some to the label, some to apple. If you buy a CD, some goes to the retailer, some goes to the label who produced the album, and some goes to the artist. It's the same thing.
Audio CDs probably have a few years left in them. But in like 5 years, many more people will have 10+ mbit internet connections, hard drives will hold 10+ TB, and you will be able to get lossless from the iTunes store.[/QUOTE]
Oh that would be so nice!!!
Wirelessly posted (Opera/9.80 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/5.19376/25.692; U; en) Presto/2.5.25 Version/10.54)
A similar discussion occured among many Apple fans in 1998 when the iMac was released without a floppy drive, I would think. If you needed, you could have bought an external floppy drive. Now, I don't know how many people took this route, but enough saw it as a viable option, or decided the floppy was no longer necessery. And as we all know, the iMac was a huge sucess, playing a key role in getting Apple back on their feet, and still pulling profits today.
Apple could be making a mistake with this one, but they're really, really good at convincing people of what they "need" or dont "need". Besides, PC's will have optical drives for years to come if the floppy disk incident repeats itself.
Or burn something onto a CD.
There still isn't a viable way other than an optical disc to copy very large amounts of data and give it to someone on a cheap, disposable medium. Sure, there are thumb drives, but those are pricey.
My wife (a teacher) makes a movie for each 5th grader going on to middle school. This movie typically comes in at about half a gigabyte - very cumbersome for downloading, and it can't be played in a DVD player hooked up to a TV (many students in her district don't have computers). So she burns 80-ish CD's every year to distribute to the kids. Doing this "in the cloud" won't work; optical media are still the most viable solution.
Apple doesn't control the public![]()
I'm ready to leave optical media behind.
Apple doesn't control the public![]()
The public will be made ready. Apple gets them ready.
The last thing you should do is rely on "the public" to move tech forward.
Like they did with vinyl?
No, that's not really true, for vinyl offers an ambiance that all digital sources fall to deliver.
And they don't degrade is storage, if well cared for, just in over-playing on poor tables.
By the same token, it's now time to prepare to leave CDs (and other optical media) behind. We have other options now. Better options.
My area has no highspeed...still.
Tired of all this cloud bs, I could barely load google on the dial up we had. Im fine for slicing it out of the comp, but include it in the sale.