I know, but he refereed to Access in the plural. That the Microsoft DBMS is not available on the Mac is an understandable point even though I disagree with its importance. Whatever the merits of Access, it does not follow that the absence of Access on the Mac means the absence of all DBM systems on the Mac. While we are on the subject of Access, some history is in order. Access is a commercial success for the singular reason that Microsoft included it in the Office suite. This wonderful product lost more than 50% of the data that its users tried to manage with it. After Microsoft foisted Access on the market, it hedged its bets with its purchase of FoxBase, a dBase clone.They're obviously referring to Microsoft *shudder* Access *shudder*.
![]()
With Mac DBM systems, it was not necessary to hedge your bets. FileMaker, 4th Dimension, OpenBase, and lesser known titles work advertised.