Why is the 2012 Mini so in Demand?

Discussion in 'Mac mini' started by RUGGLES99, Jun 27, 2015.

  1. RUGGLES99 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2015
    #1
    I have a base mid 2010, the last with superdrive that I use mainly for writing, several published nonfiction books. Ive thought of upgrading to an ssd to speed things up, but basically with 4gb of ram its fine. But it seems mini aficianados rave about the 2012. Why?
     
  2. DeltaMac macrumors 604

    DeltaMac

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2003
    Location:
    Delaware
    #2
    The 2012 may have a quad-core i7 (if you can find one for a reasonable price)
    Over the 2010, the 2012 has USB 3, Thunderbolt, and a quieter fan (some come with the older, somewhat-noisier fan)
    Finally, the SATA bus is 6Gbps, for SATA3 speeds.

    Even with your somewhat-slower model, an SSD would be a worthwhile upgrade
     
  3. yjchua95 macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2011
    Location:
    GVA, KUL, MEL (current), ZQN
    #3
    Because the 2012 mini is as close to a desktop as it can be (quad core i7 option - 2.3 or 2.6GHz, 16GB of RAM, USB 3 and Thunderbolt, plus SATA 3 (6 Gb/s).

    Aside from the mediocre iGPU, it's basically an Ivy Bridge 15" rMBP.
     
  4. z31fanatic macrumors 6502a

    z31fanatic

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2015
    Location:
    Mukilteo, WA USA
    #4
    Mostly because of the quad core i7 and it's the last model that doesn't have RAM soldered to the model board.
     
  5. Dark Void macrumors 68030

    Dark Void

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Location:
    Cimmerian End
    #5
    It's mostly because they were offered with quad core CPUs, and also in comparison to what came afterwards (2014 refresh) they're more upgradable. The 2014 models were a disappoint for various reasons including the soldering of the RAM modules (so you have to BTO your mini and pay Apple premiums) as well as removing the quad-core options. In other words, they've severely limited the product line in its most recent refresh, and the 2012 models are the next most recent ones without any of these disappointments.
     
  6. SpacemanSpiffed, Jun 27, 2015
    Last edited: Jun 27, 2015

    SpacemanSpiffed macrumors member

    SpacemanSpiffed

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2013
    Location:
    Pacific NW
    #6
    As said above, the number #1 reason for current demand is the quad core CPU. The Mini's a fantastic combination of price, packaging and performance, but the lack of a quad core CPU really screwed over the current version. #2 reason is probably the easy upgradability of RAM and Storage.

    Sadly, but quite understandably, I don't see user upgradable RAM coming back. Switching to LPDDR3 RAM makes a noticeable decrease in power consumption, especially at idel, which is one of Apple's goals, but it's not designed for use in removable modules - and there are NO LPDDR3 DIMMs produced anywhere. Back when everyone was gnashing their teeth over it after the 2104 mini announcement, I wish that had been pointed out better. Skylake CPUs may bring a change to DDR4, but I have no idea if that will bring removable/modular memory back.
     
  7. newellj macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Location:
    Boston, MA, US
    #7
    Quad core, user serviceable RAM and fixed storage...but at some point the HD4000 integrated graphics are going to catch up with some users, unfortunately...
     
  8. Pakaku macrumors 68000

    Pakaku

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2009
    #8
    eGPUs are becoming a thing...
     
  9. yjchua95 macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2011
    Location:
    GVA, KUL, MEL (current), ZQN
    #9
    Not easy to implement on Macs that don't support UEFI 2.0 (basically Ivy Bridge and earlier).
     
  10. SpinalTap macrumors regular

    SpinalTap

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2003
    Location:
    Bournville, UK
    #10
    Surprisingly, in the UK, at least a couple of 2012 Mac Mini's have appeared on the Apple Refurb Store in the past two weeks - so it's worth checking in regularly to see if some more become available.

    I really appreciate my 2012 Mac Mini Server with added SSD.
     
  11. campyguy macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2014
    Location:
    Portland / Seattle
    #11
    Yes, I agree with the first 3 with a but at the end... I've installed 10.11 B2 on my 2012 i7 Mini Server's second hard drive and it's connected to a Dell P2715Q display - IMHO it's pretty serviceable, with the display looking nicer and responding much better than with Yosemite. I also use an iPad and Duet for minor operations on the Server.

    And, if one's Mini needs a bit more "oomph" or a larger desktop, Matrox just came out a couple of months ago with two new versions of their eGPUs that support Yosemite and multiple displays. So we can get some more time out of our Minis!
     
  12. newellj macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Location:
    Boston, MA, US
    #12
    Yeah, there is that, but...$$$. ;)
     
  13. newellj macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Location:
    Boston, MA, US
    #13
    Mine drives a pair of Dell 2410 displays with no complaints from me at all, but my video demands are not high. :)
     
  14. Pakaku macrumors 68000

    Pakaku

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2009
    #14
    It always costs money to upgrade a computer.
     

Share This Page