The iPhone to me is still the king, but the HTC, Samsung and Google phones rival it somewhat. Even still, an iPhone costs about $US 1000. A Samsung Galaxy S or Google Nexus S cost about half of that! 
Jobs and co. probably don't care, since the iPhone has high enough market share. iOS may not in itself, but Android appears on a number of handsets. On a handset/model basis alone, I'm sure iPhone is perhaps the market leader. But the only reason I see rationally about this is a premium pricing strategy, or positioning the product so consumers make a distinction (,i.e. appealing to Apple fanboys). And evidently it works, since as I said the iPhone has a high relative market share.
Shouldn't Jobs and co. cut the market and get even more market share by dropping the price?
Jobs and co. probably don't care, since the iPhone has high enough market share. iOS may not in itself, but Android appears on a number of handsets. On a handset/model basis alone, I'm sure iPhone is perhaps the market leader. But the only reason I see rationally about this is a premium pricing strategy, or positioning the product so consumers make a distinction (,i.e. appealing to Apple fanboys). And evidently it works, since as I said the iPhone has a high relative market share.
Shouldn't Jobs and co. cut the market and get even more market share by dropping the price?