Why is thinner better?

Discussion in 'iMac' started by Scannall, Aug 21, 2007.

  1. Scannall macrumors member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    #1
    I really don't understand Apples drive to make the current generation of iMac even thinner than the last. It makes the heat budget your engineers have to work with even more limited. Meaning things like a sub par video card for instance.

    Heck, when I am using my iMac I couldn't tell you how thick it is. Nor do I care. If it were an inch thicker I wouldn't notice.

    And that extra space would allow a better graphics card, and maybe another hard drive in the heat budget.

    Whereas making it thinner, just really doesn't add anything useful at all to the product.
     
  2. miniConvert macrumors 68040

    miniConvert

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Location:
    Kent, UK - the 'Garden of England'.
    #2
    I think you've just defined yourself as not Apple's target audience for the iMac.

    It's all about pushing the limits. Why make a thin, gorgeous machine? Because they can! The iMac has never been brimming with power, certainly never more than now, and neither should it be.

    The Mac Pro on the other hand, well, I don't expect there to be a thin and light one of those any time soon ;)
     
  3. wakerider017 macrumors 68000

    wakerider017

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Location:
    US of A
    #3
    B/c the iMac is the coolest looking all-in-one computer on the market... Period.
     
  4. smurfy macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    #4
    You're making it sound like they say 'ok guys, this year it CANNOT go over this thick"

    No, they decide what they wanna put in the machine, then figure out how thin they can make it.
     
  5. wakerider017 macrumors 68000

    wakerider017

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Location:
    US of A
    #5
    You don't know that for sure... Not many know Apple's development process.
     
  6. Phobophobia macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2003
    #6
    Apple is fairly well-known for their cooperation between designers, engineers, and other departments. Steve Jobs once made a point about how concept cars often look amazing, but the finished product looks much worse because it was not designed with manufacturing in mind.
     
  7. iTeen macrumors 65816

    iTeen

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2007
    Location:
    Washington
    #7
    they could make it a little thicker if they built in a tv tuner...:rolleyes:
     
  8. Eric Lewis macrumors 68020

    Eric Lewis

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2007
    Location:
    CANADA? eh?
  9. CBAviator macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2007
    Location:
    Nederland
    #9

    Well, if we never made any computer thinner than the previous, you'd be typing on a HUGE computer about 2 feet thick (or maybe you are?).

    As computers become thinner, it also becomes easier to direct the air over precise areas within the computer. It is easier to direct air through a thin space than it is throughout a giant box. Just something else to think about...
     
  10. GoCubsGo macrumors Nehalem

    GoCubsGo

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    #10
    Because fat girls clothes generally cost more.

    Wait...wrong thread. Bitter party of one is in the next forum. My bad.
    :cool:
     
  11. suneohair macrumors 68020

    suneohair

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2006
    #11
    Because Steve Jobs says it is. Now shut up and buy an iMac before SJ sicks FSJ on you :D
     
  12. rest44 macrumors member

    rest44

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2006
    #12
    Because that was the only thing that come on with to improve the older design.

    They didn´t have something great to put or put there, so they just make it thinner and say: look, it´s even thinner!!!!

    Thinner is cool as long as it don´t mess with performance, but I think they cut on gpu because of that.
     
  13. flopticalcube macrumors G4

    flopticalcube

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Location:
    In the velcro closure of America's Hat
    #13
    The next higher level GPU would be a good $300 more (+ Apple Tax). That would certainly cut into sales.
     
  14. celebi251ca1 macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    #14
    The reason, in my opinion, that the new iMac is thinner is because the iMac's G5's frame was made for PowerPC processors that requires soo much space. Once they switched to intel with uses less space and requires less fan to keep it cool, they had quite a gap in the frame. so it's only naturel to shrink the current iMac's frame to fit what they have inside.
     
  15. Mgkwho macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    #15
    Right, which is why it's both. Sure Jobs (or whoever) can set a "thickness" goal, but there are manufacturing "goals" that would logically and smartly go alongside it. Each aspect plays off each other; it is not one or the other in the design process.

    Then again I don't work for Apple, and maybe that makes too much sense of what Jobs & Co. has said in the past.

    -=|Mgkwho
     
  16. boss1 macrumors 6502a

    boss1

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    #16
    incorporating a trend to a product creates value to the consumer.
     
  17. TimJim macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    May 15, 2007
    #17
    1. people tend to like slimmer, lighter, smaller.
    2. so it looks better
     
  18. l'homme macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    #18
    Because it's fashionware. Focused to the mass, not for the Pro.
    ;)
     
  19. mrmjd macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2007
    #19
    The pro argument is ridiculous and rather pretentious if you ask me. iMacs are used in design agencies around the world in a professional capacity. Sure they are used as a flagship to show consumers Apple's sleek aesthetics and to show off how great they look, but to say they are aimed purely at a home user is highly innaccurate.
     
  20. l33r0y macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    #20
    As silicon technology improves with efficiency, the heat it produces reduces (unless they crank up the speed up to previous PPW). Therefore it is of my opinion that the technology allows designers to reduce the form factor, not the other way around.

    Either that, of you just don't argue with a Jobs mandate ;)

    Sure pros use them, by they are not the target audience, they're not close to half way either.
     
  21. mrmjd macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2007
    #21
    I disagree, why not make the iMac less meaty and take 300 quid off the price in that case, like the Mini; then you're looking at serious penetration into the home user market with an all in one PC that's ready to go! I accept the Mini is supposed to do that, but the fact you still need a monitor, keyboard and mouse is a barrier to entry into the Apple market. People are simple, they want something that includes everything that doesn't require too much mucking around.
     
  22. rest44 macrumors member

    rest44

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2006
    #22
    mac book pro have a better gpu... it should at least be an option on the iMac. I´m not a gamer, but if they wan´t to be in the gamers market they need to give gamers what they want.
     
  23. shakastange macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2007
    #23
    Whoever said thinner is better? Have you ever watched Brainiac's Fat v. Thin series?

    Why thin? Jobs obsesses about it. Its totally mind boggling. Every millimetre makes a difference to their design process. Maybe it reduces manufacturing costs as less material is required. But they do spend an unhealthy amount of time on aesthetic issues. It seems to be working however, as the company is doing exceptionally well. Apple tends to put form first and foremost.
     
  24. mrmjd macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2007
    #24
    Why bother making a thin laptop then? Why not have a chunky one? Surely it's all about economising the space whether it is on a desk or on your lap, the same priniciple applies.
     
  25. iBlue macrumors Core

    iBlue

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2005
    Location:
    London, England
    #25
    Because Apple fans don't make passes at computers with fat asses.
     

Share This Page