When you don't have data or even power perhaps? When you might want to get some latest news in cases like that? Plenty of reasons for people who might care or want that. Why does it matter of some don't care about it to justify it not being enabled when it's already there (and can be functional)?
There are new forms of radio - DAB, for example - which offer multiple benefits over FM, and still don't require data.
An FM receiver still needs power!
And it matters because the longer we cling onto dying technology, the longer it takes to get a newer, better standard. Think about VHS. I don't know about the US, but in the UK we have now turned off analogue TV signals, and I think the only thing stopping us turning off analogue radio signals are car stereos.
Who actually listens to radio anymore? Radio is an 80s thing.
People that want to listen to their MLB teams broadcasts without having to pay for an MLB app.
And that must be at least .01% of the population.People that want to listen to their MLB teams broadcasts without having to pay for an MLB app.
With digital radio, FM is an ageing technology.
Why would I want to listen to fuzzy, crackly radio which cuts in and out, when I have synced music, spotify, and internet radio?
There are new forms of radio - DAB, for example - which offer multiple benefits over FM, and still don't require data.
An FM receiver still needs power!
And it matters because the longer we cling onto dying technology, the longer it takes to get a newer, better standard. Think about VHS. I don't know about the US, but in the UK we have now turned off analogue TV signals, and I think the only thing stopping us turning off analogue radio signals are car stereos.
And that must be at least .01% of the population.
Sure it may be there, but there are no antennas for it to work good by any means.
Just like the NFC chip in the new iPads. They disabled the actual NFC function and only used the chip for its secure enclave to store cards for online purchases.
There are new forms of radio - DAB, for example - which offer multiple benefits over FM, and still don't require data.
An FM receiver still needs power!
And it matters because the longer we cling onto dying technology, the longer it takes to get a newer, better standard. Think about VHS. I don't know about the US, but in the UK we have now turned off analogue TV signals, and I think the only thing stopping us turning off analogue radio signals are car stereos.
Whatever that might be, if it's something that is already there why shouldn't it be enabled so that if someone wanted to use it they could (and those who don't simply wouldn't and nothing at all would change for them).
Yup ... there are Police, and Fire Dept Apps that you can use SCANNERS ... and listen in to radio transmissions that way ... so the iPhone can do the job. Just put in an FM app ... and voila .. you got game. Then Verizon or one of the other carriers starts to advertise they have it ... and get customers with more better service.
I want one ...
![]()
There are new forms of radio - DAB, for example - which offer multiple benefits over FM, and still don't require data.
An FM receiver still needs power!
And it matters because the longer we cling onto dying technology, the longer it takes to get a newer, better standard. Think about VHS. I don't know about the US, but in the UK we have now turned off analogue TV signals, and I think the only thing stopping us turning off analogue radio signals are car stereos.
All of you poopooing the idea of it not being activated are missing the point. Of course it would be useful for some but there's no money in it for US carriers so of course it's not active. IF the carriers could make money off it or apple for that matter it would be active.
Seems like no one has mentioned that just about all smartphones that have the FM function built in only work when there is a headphone / earphones attached and reason for that is because the wire acts as a antenna.....I have never tested but I suspect using a auxiliary cable would solve this need while in the car but it would require one to use earphones/headphones while listening to FM radio all the other times....
Lastly as Norway has started to pave the way for shutting down FM radio, I'm sure more countries will do the same as time goes on.
Utilizing the FM radio frequency for Cellular services is the future as it travels further than any of the cellular frequencies available today as well as offering greatest object penetration (Buildings, forests, walls etc)
You're much more likely to get a stronger and consistent FM signal whilst out and about than you are a mobile internet connection. Besides, FM is much higher quality than mp3s and the like. Music stored on the phone in a decent format is of course the winner, but many people like to listen to FM radio (*although I'm not one of them).
----------
DAB offers zero benefit over FM other than the much increased number of stations available. The sound quality of DAB is incredibly poor.
Nope you are wrong dude .. and messed up in the science of it.
FM is line of sight .. and walls do stop the signal pretty well .. cell signal goes through walls slightly better. As you know when you talk on the cell phone inside your house but your FM radio do not work inside your house without an antenna.
I am sure you have done some scientific testing on that your self if you have any sight on the matter.
Also .. there are FM lightening jack attachments that you can plug into the iPhone right now .. some real nice ones that are very small .. they use the battery power of your iPhone to make it work.
Here is one .. that is the pits .. but it does the job ...
http://www.geekymart.com/fm-receiver-attachment-design-for-iphone-ipad-ipod-series
Some one could make an AMP Audio like power case that has FM circuits in it as well as speakers .. with a lightening jack ..
and Apple people will buy that right now .. I will.
If it has a Mirco USB port in it ... nope nope nope those are crap for the iPhone or iPod, etc.
Alan
![]()
Did this story come out on the 1st April? I suspect it did#