TBi said:Why? When you can get a cheaper PC and run windows on that. Or for the same price get a way more powerful (if not as pretty) PC.
For the price of a 20" iMac i could get a 2.4GHz Conroe with 2GB ram, 320GB Drive and a 7900GT graphics card. All together that will whip the A$$ of the iMac. Plus i can get a zalman reserator to keep it all quiet. However i can actually put it all together myself.
babsuvulawho said:Then the discussion turns to more powerful for doing what? That's the problem people seem to have with these discussions. What do you plan on doing with the computer in the first place?
After adding in the cost of a 20" flat panel LCD display a dual layer DVD burner, a decent case, a power supply, and a decent MB the price is roughly the same between the two machines with the Windows box being slightly more expensive (based on a quick quote I did from a local PC store website in my area.) Add the cost of buying Windows and for the average user a antivirus program like Norton and the Windows machine is starting to be more expensive by hundreds of dollars. I grant you the video card and cpu are better in the Windows box but you are paying a premium for the iMac form factor. It's similar to comparing a laptop to a desktop. Laptops will always be more expensive because of their size. It is difficult to compare an iMac to anything you can buy from your local PC store when you include the form factor into the discussion. Include the cost of your cooling system to keep your Windows box quiet and now the iMac is certainly hundreds of dollars cheaper.
Then of course you must consider that the OS on your "new" PC is now 5 years old and clearly inferior than OS X and Microsoft will expect you to fork over another $200 for Vista sometime next year which will be immediately outdated when Leopard is released. Include spyware and virus issues which are a plague to ordinary non-techie PC users (ask anyone who has ever worked in tech support, residential or corporate) and the Mac should be far more attractive to the average user.
I suppose the only way to end these types of discussions would be for Apple to release a true desktop between the iMac and the Mac Pro.
TBi said:Good points, i'm lucky (or unlucky) that i already have a 20" screen and a 17" as well. I don't need the screen in the iMac.
Also i'm just bitter over being two weeks without my Macbook. I just want it to be fixed and back in my hands. I'm holding out on buying a new system until i get it back. See if it's properly fixed or not.
TBi said:Good points, i'm lucky (or unlucky) that i already have a 20" screen and a 17" as well. I don't need the screen in the iMac.
Also i'm just bitter over being two weeks without my Macbook. I just want it to be fixed and back in my hands. I'm holding out on buying a new system until i get it back. See if it's properly fixed or not.
patrick0brien said:- - even called arrogant, though it is arrogance that calls you that.
tjwett said:if you're hobbies include any of the following:
-scanning for spyware
-defragging your hard drive
-looking at pixelated text
-contracting and spreading viruses
-talking to a bouncing paperclip
-using a cartoon dog to find files
then a Mac might not be for you. 🙂
Josias said:There are two reasons to stay with Windows:
1. Their computers are cheaper.
2. You are a Windows fanboy.😛
In any other aspect, Mac is superior.😀
The question is, is it worth paying $200 just be able to play Windows dependent games, use other apps dependent on Windows, and get the chance of getting virus/bugs? Because of this, I've been waiting for new updates that would improve compatibility with Windows and the features of the MacBook.dejo said:Wrong. Most games are made for Windows only. And Intel Macs can run Windows!
dsnort said:Nifty turn of phrase patrickObrien, may i borrow it in the future?