I understand what you had to say in relation to the US Congress starting and not completing the job. But the idea relating to switching to the metric system started much earlier:
Have a burning question? Email it to askanything@popsci.com
www.popsci.com
In 1975 Congress passed the Metric Conversion Act, but not as a mandate forcing the entire nation to abide by it. The reason why it was not adopted by the people related to economics: too expensive for the private sector (all industries and businesses in the private sector).
As I mentioned before I was born in a place where the metric system is the norm, and then immigrated to the US in my late teens. I don't have a problem with either the metric or the US customary measuring system. The reason why I "repeated" was to point out the reasons why Congress could not make the act mandatory. Congress could not exist without the financial support of the nation's private sector.
I'm not really buying this.
Oh sure, I can see that it started earlier. But I'm not buying the expense that the article you linked to is citing.
In particular, "Manufacturers would have to convert values on packaging."
The Fair Labeling and Packaging Act has required metric to be on all labels since 1994. Why is there a cost of converting if metric is already required to be on the label?
en.wikipedia.org
Furthermore, many industries have consistently asked Congress to ONLY print metric on their labels. They've been rebuffed. And its Congress that's stopping them.
en.wikipedia.org
In June 2010 NIST called for an amendment to the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act that would allow manufacturers the option to voluntarily label their packages solely in metric units, rather than being dual-labeled with U.S. customary units and metric units as is currently required. The goal of these changes would be to encourage metric labeling, leading to greater agreement of U.S. labeling laws and simplifying domestic and international commerce. NIST Metric Program coordinator Elizabeth Gentry added that the proposed changes were "in response to requests by U.S. manufacturers and consumers", particularly that "manufacturers want to take control of the limited net quantity of contents real estate on their packaging."
Back to your article…
Everyday people would have to replace their tape measures…
I don't know about you, but most current tape measures sold in stores seem to already have metric on them alongside imperial. I can see a period where this is continued to be allowed, but I don't see why this is a problem when metric is already there.
switch to metric wrenches
Most people have these already. Possibly the article is recognizing that fact by not stating you'd have to buy or replace your wrenches. Still don't see a problem.
waste time figuring out what it means to say its 20 degrees Celsius outside
This I can see, because most of your weather channels and your morning weather reports are all in standard. I'd hazard to guess though that any credentialed weather reporter already can speak in metric. They just don't because the studios don't want to lose ratings.
Certainly the article doesn't mention other things. There are exemptions for certain industries in the Metric Conversion Act. But personally, I think it just comes down to stubbornness.
I'll admit, I've never been a fan of metric. But it's become so prevalent that you begin to think in these terms. I just don't see it costing as much as implied. It's not like we have to toss stuff overnight.
But in any case, the public may soon well do an end run around Congress anyway. When Congress finally breaks down and mandates this it won't be news because the public will have moved on long before the lobbyists gave up. It's happening now anyway.