Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Buying Tips and Advice' started by levitynyc, Sep 6, 2006.
Based on the configuration wouldn't there be mispaired RAM issues?
I am talking about the new iMacs
The bigger question is why you wouldn't put that $750 USD towards a Mac Pro.
That's...rather sickening price. And didn't the mispaired RAM affect performance so minimally that it didn't matter anyhow?
I doubt having mispaired RAM is going to make a noticeable difference. Sure it will technically run slower but it will hardly be noticeable as RAM is accessed virtually instantly anyway no matter what config.
Paired RAM is preferred and ideal, but not having it will not negatively impact your system's performance. It may not run as well as with paired RAM, but it definitely won't result in poor performance.
but it does make sense to just get 4 GB
There is no 4GB option.
There is no 4GB option.
but you could put it in yourself. i wouldn't buy RAM from apple anyways, i can't afford it
I've got 3GB, two 512's and two 1MB - no mispairings.
The iMac only has two ram slots though, so you need a 2GB and a 1GB.
surely you me "two 1 GB"
Ah, um yes.... two 1 GB
Does anyone know why the limit is 3 GB though? Is it a firmware/motherboard limitation? What happens if you stick two 2 GB sticks in the new iMac?
Ok, didn't realize the discussion was for iMac's. And do the new boards require paired Ram like the old ones?
Read Post #4.
K... I'm going back to bed now
Paired RAM is required in the Mac Pro, but all other Macs currently do not require it at all, and really won't benefit all that much from it when used.
Basically all paired memory does is create a double-wide memory path that can improve memory bandwidth. However, memory bandwidth is only a part of the overall performance of any computer system. This is especially true when the hard disk(s) have spun down, as anyone with multiple HDDs knows all too well.
The real bottleneck today is hard disk speed, which is why Microsoft is *requiring* Flash RAM + HDD instead of only HDD to use Windows Vista effectively.
I think 3GB is a fair deal with the iMac. If Apple had added a 4GB option, that could have been stepping on the toes of the Mac Pro...which it is already, kind of.
Apple sells ram? People actually BUY RAM from apple?
Doesnt the MP access RAM in 4s instead of G5 pairs? I think thats what is meant with 'mispairing' even though it is grammatically incorekt.
Why 3GB? 2GB to do your work, and 1GB for the Rosetta overhead
The difference is around 5% from what I hear. Far too little to be noticed by an end user. Just enough to get pick up by a decent benchmark.
Yes, double the speed of RAM isn't as big a speed boost as people would expect -- unless the machine used RAM as VRAM.
Otherwise, people will notice the speed of not having enough RAM -- because there is a bigger difference between the speed of ram (5300mbps) and the hard drive (50-75mbps)
With the discrete graphics on the imac there isnt really anything that requires so much bandwitdth, all of it goes to the CPU. The extra ram could be good for future versions of OS X and bit apps such as final cut and Aperture.
Im still interested on how exactly Apple gets to 3gigs... one laptop slot, and one normal desktop slot (laptops top out at 1gig and desktop slots top out at 2gig)?
The 2gb option on the new iMacs aren't horrible... $175. Would cost $300 - whatever you could eBay the old RAM for if you got it from Crucial. So, not completely unfair at all.
There is some architectural issue that prevents the system from being able to address memory beyond 3GB. So if you install 4GB, you will still effectively only have 3GB.