Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So what do you think the impact would be if the last gen white Macbook was priced at $799? I agree. I think their sales would be exponentially higher and they'd make more net profit at a 12% margin than at a 25% margin. Why does it matter if the number is 25% or 12% if the bottom line is better?

I think that apple wants to remain a high end brand. Dell might be turning a larger profit, but they are low quality, and they don't turn as much profit per computer. For example, I will use cars to make my ideas easier to understand. Lets say a dell is a 19,000 toyota camry, and a macbook base is a bmw 530. You immediatly see the difference. If bmw sold their 5 series for 20,000, they would lose their reputation as a high end brand. They would be maybe a fancy toyota. Where's the value in that? Apple would rather be elite than turn a large profit. If you want an ugly, cheap, slow, economical car, you buy the toyota. If you want a fancy car that hugs the road and has great acceleration and is comfortable to drive you pay the german premium and buy the bmw. People who see the value in paying a premium for something they'll enjoy, they buy macs. People who want something to get the job done, painfully I might add, they buy the toyota. Thats the way it has been, and that's the way it will be. If no one else has noticed apple has been raising their prices over the past few years, I think in an attempt to separate more from windows, by offering only higher end equipment. A few years ago you could buy a mac based laptop for 999. now the cheapest is 1200. The previous gen imac base model was 999. now the cheapest is 1200.
 
you do know toyota has the best build quality of cars lol

i have friends with dell laptops that have had 0 prolems from 2003 whearas mt mb from 06 has had numerous issues....

you pay for the design anf osx. thats it really
 
The stocks cannot be compared because Apple makes more than just computers (and don't pull a BS Dell digital DJ argument) The only real argument in this thread is that Mac's cost a lot of money, and they do. So get over it, and please don't say that $999 is cheap, because it's not.

WTF, where did anyone say that $999 is cheap in this thread? They did say that the original article doesn't compare like for like but that's correct. The argument is whether or not Apple want or need to drop the cost, whether of existing models or by introducing a new unit, to compete with commodity pricing from the likes of Dell. All the evidence up to this point is that this is a totally unsupported argument, usually made by internet dwellers wanting cheaper hardware, while Apple continue to increase their market share selling at premium prices. They'd be crazy to drop prices until they see a major drop in their sales, although I'm sure there's a contingency plan in place for just such an eventuality. Until then though it's just whining for no damn reason, end of.
 
I think apple is doing everything perfectly..... to an extent

most people in the $800 market wont buy a mac, they don't give a dam about the computer as long as it is easy to use and does what they want it to do.

i think no one has the right to complain about apples computer prices
you get what you pay for...
 
Exactly LDB!

And I'd hardly consider myself a Mac "fanboy" as I've never BOUGHT a Mac, and the only ones we own are a school-issued POS iBook G4 and a mother-in-law bought aluminum MB. If my wife wasn't a teacher we would own ZERO Macs, and precisely for the price reason. We just can't afford to spend $1100 or $1300 on a laptop.

Ever since the Intel switch, I've lusted over a MacBook Pro (I like to game in my spare time so the old MB was not acceptable) but I sure as hell can't spend $2000 on a laptop to have the ability to play some older 3D games.

For $800 I have a choice between several well-equipped laptops that would suit a wide variety of purposes, including light gaming. Sure, the build quality and "look and feel" won't be as good as a Mac, but I'd definitely get more value out of it in the variety of tasks it can perform.

It's the same on the desktop end. I'd love to have a Mac desktop and I know that I wouldn't be able to just go and buy any hardware out there to use with it, but the lack of a mid-range Mac tower just kills me.

Just open any Best Buy or Circuit City ad, and look at the specs of virtually every desktop PC in there, and compare them to the iMac. Most of the desktop PC's come with LCD monitors, Quad-Core CPU's, 4-6GB of RAM, and some even have discrete graphics cards. Yet the iMac continues to piddle around with mobile dual-core chips, limited RAM capacity, and pathetic (and non-upgradeable) graphics cards (except in the top-end iMac).

Has anyone noticed that Apple doesn't have a single Mac with a DESKTOP Quad-Core chip? That can't bother just me. I built my own PC with a Quad-Core and 8GB of RAM, and I love to build PC's, but I'd absolutely spend a moderate percentage more to purchase a Mac tower with a Quad if one were available. Hell, I'd even pay the price premium for the "Apple-compatible" 8800GT graphics card. And I'd be absolutely thrilled with my Mac that didn't cost more than the down payment on my car but that can do everything an iMac can plus play games and use my existing LCD. I know I'm not the only one begging for a Mac tower.


Speaking of LCD's, I have a 24" Dell 2407WFP that works beautifully. Why am I forced to get ANOTHER LCD (iMac) or spend $3000+ to get a Mac tower that can work with $500 LCD I've already invested in? Yeah, I know the response is "you don't have to buy a Mac," but what about the very LARGE AMOUNT of us who actually WANT to buy a Mac but don't have an acceptable product from them to buy?

:confused:
I don't understand your point. Why do you want a mac? If they don't make anything that is up to your standards...why do you want one?
 
Apple doesn't make their products tailored to Windows users. They make them as a ecosystem. If you don't like it, don't buy it. But do not go around trashing it because Apple didn't spend billions in R&D just for you as an individual. You could easily buy a used PowerMac tower... Apple also cares for build quality, hence the unibody architecture vs. some cheap plastic on Dells. That costs extra money no? Backlit keys, glass screen, Apple is a quality product and an innovative company. Dell and all the other PC vendors copy off of Apple and make things worse but have the same look.
 
This is the biggest thing of bs i have seen.

First off look at the percentages of people switching to apple. Notice how many people are switching even with the price difference? If macs where that cheep everyone would own one.

Honestly think of it. not even discussing os here

A BEAUTIFUL labtop. these things are very nice looking and apple really takes the time to innovate on them. I can almost guarantee for the same price some would pick a mac over a pc(again no os included here) because macs just look better. Same product, but one looks better, and probly will last longer in the long run.

Know we could argue for hours on os. i prefer os x but thats just me.
 
Such BUNK! The people saying they would like to own a Mac but can't afford one. Yeah I'll bet many of those same people have a hybrid plasma screen mounted on their wall and/or a PS3 or Nintendo Wii. Couple that with an expensive DV cam. Yeah don't lie, at least one of you here complaining about the price of a Mac fits this bill.

My thing is, if some of you that don't even own a Mac and have no intention of buying one because of Apple's high prices then why the heck are you on a Mac forum, this particularly foes for the OP.
 
Such BUNK! The people saying they would like to own a Mac but can't afford one. Yeah I'll bet many of those same people have a hybrid plasma screen mounted on their wall and/or a PS3 or Nintendo Wii. Couple that with an expensive DV cam. Yeah don't lie, at least one of you here complaining about the price of a Mac fits this bill.

My thing is, if some of you that don't even own a Mac and have no intention of buying one because of Apple's high prices then why the heck are you on a Mac forum, this particularly foes for the OP.

everyone on this forum must have some curiosity about macs. thats how i started and now what do you know i'm getting my first mac the aluminum macbook
 
If I was Apple I would dramatically reduce the profit margin on an entry level Macbook (0 - 5% maybe) to bring people in the door and increase market share.

A $699 laptop would sell like mad. That's the price point I would shoot for on an entry level laptop!

Please tell me you are not in business :) Seriously though what business can make any portion of their product line sustain at 0-5% margins? Very very few even as a loss leader. You'd need to have costs less than 1% of revenue to run the entire company and there are very few business aside from perhaps brokers or traders of commodities that can run any business for that low of a cost structure ( well, legal businesses at any rate)

Market share gained at the cost of killing your profits, impacting your investors and pummeling your stock price is a very risky gamble at best. You'd be better off at the roulette wheels in Vegas.

They can definitely stand to make less money at the low end, but not that much less. Gross margins need to be 35-50% and net margins after expenses at least 15%. Otherwise throw the cash in the bank or invest it in bonds because at least you will not be putting it in a pile and incinerating it.

I definitely hear you though, on the low end they should be pushing the envelope on margins in order to make the entry level more affordable for the masses.
 
Now, please keep in mind I'm typing this on my Macbook Pro (Aug 06), and I don't intend to go back to Windows anytime soon (if ever), but Dell does a great job of getting computers out there. They sell consumer computers at consumer price points. I love the new Macbook (got to play with it today), but the fact is, the new Macbooks are consumer notebooks that aren't at consumer price points. The lowest new Macbook is at 1299? I'll admit the Macbook Pros are much more within reach for people than they were. The low end Macbook though, should not be more expensive than the previous low end Macbook, at least if Apple wants to keep selling them to consumers (and more importantly, switchers). Some, like myself and many here are willing to pay a bit more, but the lack of a sub $1000 Macbook is a HUGE reason why a lot of people don't switch to the Mac.

I really hope they can get a price cut in the not too distant future though. Maybe once the manufacturing process isn't as expensive?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.