Wierd '17 or older' warning

Discussion in 'iPhone' started by funrush, Jun 17, 2009.

  1. funrush macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2008
    #1
    Dear Apple, 'Things' is not shockingly violent or sexually explicit.

    [​IMG]
     
  2. superstrikertwo macrumors 65816

    superstrikertwo

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2008
    Location:
    California
  3. benflick macrumors 68020

    benflick

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
  4. marksman macrumors 603

    marksman

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2007
  5. thelumpya2 macrumors regular

    thelumpya2

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    #5
    me too
     
  6. Pcpro745 macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
  7. ~Wibble~ macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Location:
    England
  8. Mac-Addict macrumors 65816

    Mac-Addict

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Location:
    London
    #9
    It's to check if over 17 year olds can spell "weird".
     
  9. chrismac00 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2007
    #10
    Haha. +1
     
  10. kdarling macrumors demi-god

    kdarling

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Location:
    Cabin by a lake
    #11
    Apple seems full of lawyers.

    Now we can see what their future voice recognition will be used for...

    "John Spartan, you are fined one credit for a violation of the verbal morality statute!"
     
  11. benflick macrumors 68020

    benflick

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    #12
    Uh-oh, I hit yes, but I'm 15, not 17. Can I get arrested?
    Haha, just kidding
     
  12. DHarrisDBS34 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    #13
    It's the Parental Controls stuff. So if Parents want block apps for certain age groups they can.
     
  13. LoganT macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    #14
    But this Things and Shazam aren't explicit, in any sense of the word. You might as well apply this to the Notes application because you can type a swear word in it.
     
  14. tayshon macrumors 6502a

    tayshon

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2009
    Location:
    Philly, PA
    #15
    Same here :rolleyes:
     
  15. Shawn Parr macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    #16
    I wonder if this is a default that happens if the Dev doesn't specify the rating. i.e. assume without any rating to make the default as blocked rather than allowed by parental controls. Probably will get less complaints from people actually using the controls.

    Those not using the controls just see a notice and click through it.
     
  16. LoganT macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    #17
    Of course the problem is a kid shouldn't have to be 17 or older to use Shazam or Things. And if their parents puts a control on it, then they can't use it.
     
  17. benflick macrumors 68020

    benflick

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    #18
    Some song titles may have vulgarity, or since there are links to get the song in Shazam, kids could get it I guess. Pointless if you ask me, if kids want to look up bad things, they will regardless of attempts to stop them.
     
  18. Shawn Parr macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    #19
    I don't disagree with this, especially as both I have kids, and I still remember being one... :)

    However if someone is going to make a feature like Parental Controls they probably should make it work out of the box in a way that Parents who will use it will expect. I mean really, what is the point of a Parental Control interface if a dev just has to not rate their app to get around it completely? (Of course you would think the store approval process would catch this, but I wouldn't be surprised if there were just as many 'wrong' approvals as there are 'wrong' rejected that we hear about here like the NIN app).

    And they did warn developers at WWDC to make sure to update their apps with ratings. Or was it when the previous beta to the GM build came out?
     

Share This Page