PDubNYC said:try again, grasshopper. Believe it or not, MacSlash had it on the 19th.
http://macslash.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/19/134215&mode=thread
That's nothing! Apple had it back on the.. oops, never mind..
PDubNYC said:try again, grasshopper. Believe it or not, MacSlash had it on the 19th.
http://macslash.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/19/134215&mode=thread
Lepton said:Wi-Fi makes sense. Airport Express needs a remote, everyone said so, and Apple winked back a smiling "we know".
I predict an accessory. Small, Wi-Fi, half power (150ft), b only, battery operated, plugs into the iPod, makes it a dynamite remote for your computer. It is not meant for syncing to the computer or streaming out of the iPod, even though it might be possible to do. It is meant to send commands to your computer to run AppleScripts. Scripts will control iTunes, presentations and ALL sorts of things. Scripts reside on the computer but if they are missing a copy is on the iPod and sent to the computer.
Next gen iPods might have this built in.
As for Bluetooth, there is a new profile for it that can stream CD-quality audio to good stereo headphones. We can easily imagine this in an iPod to allow for wireless headphones. I'm up for that!
As for video, we should remember that Apple probably doesn't hire people for the very short term. Someday video will be in handheld Apple devices and the research of this will take a while.
I don't see a video product right away, though I'm dying for one. Apple's pattern is usually not to be first in such obvious products. Note the iPod was not first, it was best. Same with iSight and any number of products. So, let the other guys come out with the first gen of video devices, let them shake it out enough so Apple can see what people REALLY need in such a device and what people REALLY do and can do with it. Then, when the right hardware is available, a dyno-mite product will appear.
I see a video product coming out after the OLED screens are up to speed. Brighter, thinner, lighter, wider view, lower power. Main problem left is limited lifetime. Then, I see a device that is thin, Wi-Fi g, OLED with stylius, and optimized to run Apple Remote Access! In other words it's not as much a stand alone device as it is a remote screen for a real Mac. Now THERE'S a remote!
JoePike said:Lastly, here's a crazy idea. Not sure why nobody has come out with something like this yet...or maybe it exists and I just haven't seen it yet. IIt'd be just like buying a new car stereo and mounting it in the dash, except...way, way cooler.![]()
-Joe
JoePike said:Yeah, we're in for a bunch of trouble here, aren't we Mac fans? All those brainless consumers out there who spend $350 on their garbage Winblows machines will be flooding the MS online music store to purchase MS garbage-encoded music online with their garbage dialup connections so they can play them on their garbage 128MB Rio MP3 players. Watch out!
I give it three days until some hacker figures out a way to spread a nasty chaos-enducing virus by exploiting some inevitable major security flaw in this Microsoft music store, undermining the entire thing and running it into the ground. Mark my words...
comictimes said:I personally would much rather have them focus on making the ipod as ridiculously tiny and thin as possible rather than give it more features. Or, if they do make a video ipod, I would like for them to make a related product, but split it off from the ipod line. So that you will be able to have your tiny ipod which plays music and does a couple other spiffy things, or your slightly larger physically ipod which can play movies as well as music... that would be good, I think.
I also agree, as i said in an earlier post (page 3, I think). At first I was skeptical about Apple NOT coming out with a iPod with video capabilities, but after thinking about it logically it really doesn't make sense to do so. The iPod is a music player, and a damn good one at that. Adding video means more expense, a much bigger unit (to account for the huge ass battery needed to power the screen), and bigger hard drives. By adding video (at this time in technology), everything we know and love about the iPod will cease and all for some stupid ability to play videos that one might only use when on a plane or road trip.dontmatter said:Agreed. The ipod does music well, and that's the only thing I want it for. If somebody wants an everything pod, they can, but please don't kill the ipod because you think music will get old, and there have to be new features.
JoePike said:Dude, you're like Ms. Cleo. Are you using a deck of tarot cards or what? "I see this, I don't see that." It's like you're reading Steve Jobs' palm or something!![]()
I guess my big question is this: Since I've looked at some teardown pics of the 4G iPod, and there is pretty clearly no antenna in there for either bluetooth or wifi, the only option is to come out with some external attachment device that would likely plug into the dock connector to provide these functionalities, if they become available at all. That being the case, why would said attachments not work with other generations of the iPod featuring the dock connector, i.e. the 3G iPods or the minis?
aswitcher said:I wonder if this thign appears whether it will be from the iPod division or the main Mac comp division...
IBM debuts pocket-sized PC
By Tony Smith (tony.smith at theregister.co.uk)
Published Wednesday 25th February 2004 12:36*GMT
IBM Japan has developed a tiny prototype PC that measures just 16 x 8.2 x 2.2cm (6.4 x 3.3 x 0.9in) and weights a mere 300g (10.6oz), the company said today.
For now dubbed the PC Core System, the (literally) pocket PC is based on a 1GHz Transmeta Crusoe TM5800 processor. Inside the case, you'll also find 256MB of memory - it can take up to 512MB - and a 20GB 2.5in hard drive. The machine runs a variety of versions of Windows.
......
snip
In fact, what the PC Core System most reminds us of is Apple's iPod. It may be a hard drive-based music player now, but the iPod already offers basic PIM display functionality, and adding support for still and moving photography would be a doddle. Mac OS X 10.3 was originally planned to allow users to store their Home directories on an iPod. That feature may not have made it to the final cut, but it remains a possibility for future versions of the OS.
At that point you've essentially got a next-generation PDA - or the kind of device today's PDAs are evolving toward (http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/archive/33629.html) - and it's no great surprise to see the machine's processing power grow to allow it to do all the heavy lifting too. Carry your iPod with you during to day to listen to music, read email, check your diary and so on. At home or in the office, you just slide it into your Cinema Display - or a cradle connected to the LCD - and do some work. ®
foniks2020 said:Actually it waits until you feed it after midnight! Then it runs and jumps in the toilet and MULTIPLIES... playing 50¢ and Madonna tunes all morning, partying and drinking all your alcohol....
beware the 4G iPod...
Agreed. That's exactly the first thing I thought when I saw that ad. Good to see I'm not the only one.717 said:It al makes sens: we are getting an iTablet based on a iPod. Not an iTablet based on an iBook. Nice spin-off.![]()