I mean The Snappy performance of the Air, Will it come if i added an SSD to the Pro? (Boot times, Launching apps, And such....)? and if so, Which SSD Should i buy?
I respectfully disagree. SSDs are not something you want to "future proof", at the moment. The price of NAND flash is going down rapidly. You'd be better off buying a drive that your computer can utilize at the moment (if your Mac is SATA II, not SATA III). In one year SSDs will be substantially less money ($150 for 128GB and $350-400 for 256GB would be my guess). Save your money instead of wasting it in an attempt to "future proof" the drive.As for an SSD, I'd go for an Intel 510 or another SATA III SSD to maximize future proofing your MBP.![]()
In theory yes, in reality it might be a tad slower. One of the reasons the MBA is so quick is because of the minimal circuitry (due to size constraints) so connections don't have to travel as far on the board. But an SSD and 4GB ram combo should make the difference minimal.
As for an SSD, I'd go for an Intel 510 or another SATA III SSD to maximize future proofing your MBP.![]()
I respectfully disagree. SSDs are not something you want to "future proof", at the moment. The price of NAND flash is going down rapidly. You'd be better off buying a drive that your computer can utilize at the moment (if your Mac is SATA II, not SATA III). In one year SSDs will be substantially less money ($150 for 128GB and $350-400 for 256GB would be my guess). Save your money instead of wasting it in an attempt to "future proof" the drive.
In theory yes, in reality it might be a tad slower. One of the reasons the MBA is so quick is because of the minimal circuitry (due to size constraints) so connections don't have to travel as far on the board. But an SSD and 4GB ram combo should make the difference minimal.
As for an SSD, I'd go for an Intel 510 or another SATA III SSD to maximize future proofing your MBP.![]()
In this current generation, the MBP is quite a bit faster than the Air when the MBP has an SSD installed. There is a comparison on YouTube of the two side-by-side.
.
YES!!! This is exactly how I felt before buying a SSD. Flash storage in a hard drive is, in my opinion, the best thing that has happened to computing in the last 10 years. Maybe I'm just a little too excited...get the sad! its the best thing you can ever do for your computer! Before I had to treat it like a baby just incase the heads scratched the disk! Now i can through it down the side of the sofa, turn it upside down and shake it and throw it around like you would a macbook air! Liberating. Instead of that constant humming, vibration, battery drain and change of use, knowing you have something spinning inside with all your data! And waiting for it to go to sleep LOL![]()
HOLY F! So much mis-information!
You do realize it only takes light 8 minutes to reach the Earth from the Sun right? Electricity moves pretty quick as well, even with resistors. A few extra inches of circuitry won't make the much more powerful CPU slower at all. The MBP will be faster than the MBA due to better processor, etc.
Also, future proofing SSD is stupid. Like someone else said, the price of SSD's will drop in the next few years, DRASTICALLY. Also, as mentioned on a number of other threads on here, SATA III SSD's are really unstable on the new 2011 MBP's. It's much safer to just stick with a SATA II SSD for now to avoid problems.
Yes, an SSD would make a MBP very similar to an MBA in speed, if not faster due to speedier processors.
I would upgrade now if you have the funds to do so, but as many have stated, prices for SSDs should drop soon.
The effect an SSD has on a computer, is IMO, amazing.
"In My Opinion"thanks everyone for the comments,
but a little stupid question (Am new here)
What is IMO ?
Why not wait till the refreshed MBA are released then make your decision?
When comparing 2010 MBA (Core 2 Duo) to a 2011 MBP, the MBP is faster. Once the MBA's get ULV Sandy Bridge CPU's, MBA might have a slight edge.
And maybe comparing SSD's to future proofing wasn't a good idea.![]()
HOLY F! So much mis-information! You do realize it only takes light 8 minutes to reach the Earth from the Sun right? ....,
In theory yes, in reality it might be a tad slower. One of the reasons the MBA is so quick is because of the minimal circuitry (due to size constraints) so connections don't have to travel as far on the board. But an SSD and 4GB ram combo should make the difference minimal.
As for an SSD, I'd go for an Intel 510 or another SATA III SSD to maximize future proofing your MBP.![]()
HOLY F! So much mis-information!
You do realize it only takes light 8 minutes to reach the Earth from the Sun right? Electricity moves pretty quick as well, even with resistors. A few extra inches of circuitry won't make the much more powerful CPU slower at all. The MBP will be faster than the MBA due to better processor, etc.
Also, future proofing SSD is stupid. Like someone else said, the price of SSD's will drop in the next few years, DRASTICALLY. Also, as mentioned on a number of other threads on here, SATA III SSD's are really unstable on the new 2011 MBP's. It's much safer to just stick with a SATA II SSD for now to avoid problems.