I really have reservations about getting a bulky 16" but at the same time the high-end multi-core processing power comes across is "future-proof". Thanks
Very much doubt it. It seems that Apple have different goals for the 16" and the 13".
16" is designed to provide maximum CPU and GPU performance within a thermal envelop consistent with a portable design. Hence the use of H-class 45W CPU.
13" design seems more focused on portability and battery life. Hence the use of 15 - 28W CPU.
Of course if Intel get their act together we may see more cores in mid-range mobile CPU.
Very much doubt it. It seems that Apple have different goals for the 16" and the 13".
16" is designed to provide maximum CPU and GPU performance within a thermal envelop consistent with a portable design. Hence the use of H-class 45W CPU.
13" design seems more focused on portability and battery life. Hence the use of 15 - 28W CPU.
Of course if Intel get their act together we may see more cores in mid-range mobile CPU.
I would say it's likely, seeing how the i7 8650u is a quad core 15W chip, it's just a matter of time before the fabrication will allow that sort of chip to be produced. Probably won't happen for 4 years seeing how far behind Intel is falling.
We might even see a 6 core AMD chip before that happens.
I would say it's likely, seeing how the i7 8650u is a quad core 15W chip, it's just a matter of time before the fabrication will allow that sort of chip to be produced. Probably won't happen for 4 years seeing how far behind Intel is falling.
We might even see a 6 core AMD chip before that happens.
There is a 6 core i7-U already, the only problem is it only has UHD graphics (I assume because too much TDP is taken up by the extra two cores for Iris Plus) - this could be an interesting option if Apple also have room in a 14" thermal design for a low end dGPU ... but it would still only be an i7, maybe Intel missed a trick here!